/
Open Enter

Compare every position

83 positions · 121 measures. Each measure has a limit: red is past it (a problem), amber is close to it, green is a strength. Names that need attention first.
built 1m ago
Decide: 0 selected
    Measures What the numbers say Price & movement Vs its group Reporting tree Tier labels GICS Solvency Margins & earnings Lenders Capital & payout Valuation & sentiment Expectations Position & data
Ticker · decide Why we own it Attention Problems Deep Close Strengths What’s wrong What’s strong 1 day 1 week 1 month 3 months 6 months 1 year 2 years Year to date Off 52-week high vs 50-day avg vs 200-day avg Realised volatility Volatility regime Beta vs S&P 500, 1y vs S&P 500, 3m vs its peer group, 3m vs its peer group, 1y Revenue growth vs peers Rank in its group Peers to compare with Levels up to find peers Its group's weight L1 sector · 1m L1 sector · 3m L1 sector · 6m L1 sector · 1y L2 group · 1m L2 group · 3m L2 group · 6m L2 group · 1y L3 subgroup · 1m L3 subgroup · 3m L3 subgroup · 6m L3 subgroup · 1y Tier 1 · 1m Tier 1 · 3m Tier 1 · 6m Tier 1 · 1y Tier 2 · 1m Tier 2 · 3m Tier 2 · 6m Tier 2 · 1y Tier 3 · 1m Tier 3 · 3m Tier 3 · 6m Tier 3 · 1y GICS sector · 1m GICS sector · 3m GICS sector · 6m GICS sector · 1y GICS industry · 1m GICS industry · 3m GICS industry · 6m GICS industry · 1y Net debt / EBITDA Interest coverage FCF after interest Cash runway Current ratio Current debt vs cash Debt / equity Net debt issued Interest expense, YoY Gross margin Operating margin Net margin EBITDA margin Gross margin, trend Operating margin, YoY Revenue growth Total assets growth FCF conversion Capex / op cash flow Receivables / revenue Inventory days Unusual items Rule of 40 Return on equity Return on assets Book value/share growth Op cash flow/share growth R&D / revenue Revenue volatility Earnings volatility Net interest income / assets Net interest income growth Cost / income proxy Share count, YoY Stock comp / revenue Equity issued Payout on EPS Payout on FCF Payout on op cash flow Dividend yield Yield vs its 5y avg Days since ex-dividend Capital returned vs earnings Share buybacks Free cash flow yield Our position size P/E trailing P/E forward PEG Price to book Upside to target Analyst rating Short interest Days to cover Insider net, 180d Insider buys, 180d Insider $ bought, 180d Insider $ sold, 180d Earnings beat rate Days to exit Target raises - lowers, 30d Downgrades, 180d Price-target change Days to earnings Unrealised P&L Days held
CRWD
Tov buy
Equity — Growth - Aggressive 2 13 7 5 44
Earnings volatility 1,948%
P/E trailing 5,321×
P/E forward 165.67×
Net debt / EBITDA -22.98×
6 months 169.6%
vs 200-day avg 70.7%
0.2%-0.0%26.7%34.1%169.6%108.7%263.2%127.0%-7.3%18.1%70.7%54.0%1.40×1.2092.8pp31.1pp21.1pp21.1pp121.0pp60.3pp22.4pp13.8pp125.8pp114.2pp-22.98×-3.53×$1.2B1.57×16.0%6.5%75.2%-2.3%0.8%2.0%-0.3pp-3.2pp25.8%27.4%23.0%28.3%23.541.5%-0.8%32.1%14.2%28.8%8.1%1,948%1.5%21.7%106.1%2.2%22.8%0.0%0.0%0.5%0.4%5,321×165.67×8.40×53.39×-10.6%1.722.8%2d100.0%0d05.2%54d194.1%582d
NOW
Equity — Growth - Regular 2 14 5 14 14
P/E trailing 85.11×
Price to book 11.25×
L1 sector · 1y -87.7pp
Interest coverage 99.30×
Book value/share growth 33.0%
Op cash flow/share growth 25.8%
-1.2%-1.2%1.5%25.1%51.6%-25.5%-26.2%-11.1%-29.4%3.8%17.9%57.8%0.84×0.99-41.4pp22.1pp-5.3pp11.7pp-2.6pp-80.3pp-4.9pp4.1pp-2.0pp-31.2pp1.25×99.30×$4.5B0.70×67.5%0.0%74.8%4.1%11.3%19.7%-1.6pp1.3pp24.0%27.7%259.3%16.7%19.8%28.0614.2%4.2%33.0%25.8%22.3%7.5%17.3%1.6%20.9%86.3%1.4%14.7%0.0%0.0%105.3%$1.8B3.2%1.3%85.11×27.20×1.01×11.25×7.8%1.432.8%2d100.0%0d11-1.1%20d41.6%112d
JNJ
Equity — Undervalued 2 6 4 15 13
Unusual items 6.3%
Interest expense, YoY 28.6%
Target raises - lowers, 30d -1
Interest coverage 34.55×
Unrealised P&L 63.5%
Book value/share growth 14.0%
-2.1%-2.2%-6.0%-2.3%4.9%33.4%58.5%22.3%-10.0%-4.7%4.4%19.2%0.84×0.2117.6pp-5.3pp-7.2pp-2.3pp-7.5pp28.7pp-3.7pp-0.0pp-6.7pp28.4pp0.69×34.55×$18.3B1.09×0.41×57.7%19.7%28.6%68.1%29.2%21.5%35.6%-1.2pp3.3pp6.6%10.6%72.1%21.3%18.2%55d6.3%35.7925.7%8.6%14.0%1.0%15.6%2.3%3.5%0.0%6.0%72.8%0.0%1.4%0.0%60.7%64.1%50.5%2.1%0.79×44d68.4%$6.0B3.2%0.8%29.32×20.91×2.82×7.17×10.5%1.911.0%3d75.0%0d-110.9%5d63.5%526d
ETN
Mor buy
Equity — Growth - Regular 2 6 3 11 16
Interest expense, YoY 85.4%
Current debt vs cash 1.64×
Price to book 8.31×
Capital returned vs earnings 85.3%
Interest coverage 21.46×
Rank in its group 2
0.5%-0.9%2.7%6.8%8.3%15.1%29.2%36.1%-9.3%2.2%10.9%39.4%0.89×1.13-0.8pp3.8pp8.3pp13.1pp13.4pp-2.3pp3.34×21.46×$3.3B1.24×1.64×105.1%1.6%85.4%36.0%16.6%12.8%22.1%-0.6pp0.4pp21.4%7.5%86.9%20.6%19.6%63d37.9619.7%7.0%6.4%4.7%2.9%7.9%11.5%-0.6%10.3%81.0%-1.3%43.5%45.8%36.4%1.0%0.73×62d85.3%$1.9B2.1%0.4%44.10×26.68×2.67×8.31×11.4%1.572.0%4d100.0%0d00-1.8%26d21.5%688d
BLK
Equity — Growth - Regular 2 5 1 15 12
Op cash flow/share growth -20.8%
Operating margin, YoY -4.3pp
Gross margin, trend -2.7pp
Capital returned vs earnings 95.4%
Book value/share growth 17.6%
EBITDA margin 40.7%
-1.1%-0.6%-3.4%3.8%5.6%-9.2%11.5%-1.1%-13.3%-4.6%-0.3%27.5%0.75×1.42-25.0pp0.8pp3.1pp6.1pp-1.2pp-15.2pp0.12×13.41×$2.9B2.45×23.2%1.1%14.1%47.1%35.1%24.1%40.7%-2.7pp-4.3pp30.6%22.6%64.0%9.5%0.5%65.6812.3%3.7%17.6%-20.8%9.1%24.0%-0.0%18.7%67.3%0.1%5.4%52.4%94.2%85.2%2.2%0.95×30d95.4%$2.0B2.1%0.8%25.33×16.50×0.89×2.85×24.2%1.441.3%4d100.0%0d07.9%6d-6.8%388d
PG
Equity — Undervalued 2 5 1 11 11
PEG 3.79×
Current debt vs cash 1.14×
Rule of 40 23.58
Capital returned vs earnings 95.1%
Interest coverage 24.23×
Return on assets 10.7%
0.8%3.5%2.4%1.5%1.6%-1.1%-11.4%4.0%-10.9%2.3%0.9%19.6%0.78×0.38-16.9pp-1.5pp3.2pp2.0pp9.7pp-9.2pp1.03×24.23×$14.3B0.68×1.14×64.5%-0.3%-3.3%50.9%22.1%18.4%28.4%-1.0pp-1.6pp1.5%1.0%94.4%22.5%7.0%34d0.0%23.5830.3%10.7%4.8%10.6%2.8%14.9%-0.4%3.3%77.3%-0.8%0.6%64.3%67.6%52.3%2.9%1.17×76d95.1%$5.0B4.4%0.8%22.52×20.15×3.79×6.50×7.9%2.121.0%3d100.0%0d00.0%14d3.6%36d
MSFT
Equity — Growth - Regular 1 7 5 20 27
Price to book 8.91×
L1 sector · 1y -59.6pp
Tier 1 · 1y -59.6pp
Interest coverage 55.39×
Op cash flow/share growth 34.5%
Book value/share growth 28.9%
0.2%3.5%7.5%38.1%42.3%1.1%28.0%9.8%-4.1%7.0%22.4%32.2%0.62×1.10-14.7pp35.1pp1.0pp25.3pp-12.4pp-52.4pp1.6pp18.1pp-12.2pp-2.3pp0.25×55.39×$63.9B1.23×0.12×29.1%-2.3%27.9%67.9%45.1%40.3%58.5%-0.9pp1.2pp17.7%22.5%50.1%63.4%24.4%2d1.7%62.8134.0%14.1%28.9%34.5%10.7%5.9%13.6%0.0%17.8%53.2%-0.1%3.7%0.1%19.8%39.5%14.5%0.7%0.95×36.4%$22.3B1.7%5.7%29.57×22.42×1.62×8.91×10.7%1.290.9%3d100.0%0d002.6%20d17.2%1234d
AAPL
Equity — Growth - Regular 1 11 4 12 13
Price to book 45.94×
Its group's weight 36.5%
Op cash flow/share growth -3.5%
Return on equity 148.8%
Return on assets 27.1%
Book value/share growth 32.5%
0.4%2.4%6.9%6.9%29.8%31.0%49.8%24.4%-2.1%4.9%16.6%24.7%0.79×1.0715.2pp3.9pp0.4pp-7.3pp-25.5pp-21.1pp0.15×1.00×0.33×78.4%-10.1%48.6%32.6%27.6%36.0%0.7pp0.5pp16.4%-1.6%88.2%11.4%9.6%5d49.02148.8%27.1%32.5%-3.5%8.3%15.1%20.5%6.4%68.0%-2.3%3.1%12.0%15.6%13.8%0.3%0.68×59d94.8%$90.7B2.0%4.8%38.77×35.28×2.71×45.94×-3.0%2.200.9%3d100.0%0d10.5%25d57.9%616d
CEG
Equity — Growth - Regular 1 10 4 18 15
Current debt vs cash 2.50×
Gross margin, trend -7.0pp
PEG 3.74×
Op cash flow/share growth 272.3%
1 week 12.8%
Rank in its group 1
-2.5%12.8%-2.4%16.5%4.2%-21.3%4.5%-17.3%-29.3%7.0%1.8%48.5%1.12×1.13-37.1pp13.5pp0.3pp22.7pp13.3pp-8.2pp4.03×7.87×$777M1.46×2.50×76.4%2.3%1.0%22.1%8.7%11.1%25.4%-7.0pp-4.1pp23.0%8.2%55.5%69.6%14.0%25d1.2%31.6615.1%3.9%10.5%272.3%25.4%47.7%-0.9%8.3%83.6%-0.2%15.9%37.7%11.5%0.6%1.05×51d38.2%$400M1.2%0.8%28.53×21.91×3.74×3.24×17.0%1.553.7%5d75.0%0d00.6%32d5.0%44d
DE
Equity — Growth - Regular 1 9 4 13 12
Current debt vs cash 2.93×
Op cash flow/share growth -18.8%
Debt / equity 230.3%
Unrealised P&L 85.3%
Book value/share growth 14.2%
Rank in its group 1
-2.5%-4.0%-5.9%8.0%3.6%39.0%59.9%37.5%-11.2%-1.7%8.4%32.2%0.90×0.8723.1pp5.0pp-1.6pp14.5pp8.0pp25.0pp4.94×2.97×$61M2.13×2.93×230.3%-2.5%-5.3%25.2%13.4%10.2%17.9%-2.1pp-3.8pp4.9%-1.2%64.3%56.7%12.1%61d0.1%18.2718.2%3.8%14.2%-18.8%5.2%10.8%29.9%-3.0%-11.6%81.2%-0.5%0.3%36.0%53.2%23.1%1.0%0.84×8d56.9%$1.1B1.9%0.8%35.59×28.19×1.59×6.17×8.1%1.962.1%4d100.0%0d10.6%48d85.3%1029d
LLY
Equity — Growth - Regular 1 5 4 11 21
Price to book 29.94×
Unusual items 5.2%
1 day -4.3%
Book value/share growth 86.5%
Op cash flow/share growth 91.3%
Return on equity 102.3%
-4.3%-1.1%1.2%-6.5%19.1%34.5%24.5%5.9%-12.0%-3.1%5.8%34.4%0.66×0.4518.7pp-9.5pp1.0pp-7.1pp8.7pp30.0pp5.3pp-5.2pp11.1pp29.7pp1.45×1.35×0.18×162.1%14.7%83.4%54.2%33.5%52.4%1.7pp7.7pp47.7%42.9%28.9%64.5%27.2%77d5.2%101.92102.3%20.4%86.5%91.3%20.5%12.9%11.4%44.7%54.4%-0.3%1.0%21.7%90.3%32.0%0.6%0.80×55d46.0%$4.1B0.6%2.5%38.19×23.90×1.14×29.94×16.8%1.630.8%3d100.0%0d21d40.7%806d
GOOGL
Equity — Growth - Regular 1 6 3 8 22
Interest expense, YoY 174.6%
Unusual items 6.0%
Net debt issued 26.6%
Interest coverage 216.80×
Op cash flow/share growth 32.8%
Book value/share growth 29.0%
-0.3%3.3%3.3%-2.6%9.7%42.9%112.6%11.7%-14.5%1.1%2.9%31.4%0.69×1.2127.0pp-5.6pp3.8pp-11.3pp14.2pp51.3pp-0.67×216.80×$72.5B2.72×18.9%26.6%174.6%60.9%34.0%54.8%38.8%1.5pp-0.1pp24.2%32.2%55.4%55.5%15.6%6.0%58.2348.7%13.0%29.0%32.8%15.2%7.6%57.3%0.6%15.1%68.0%-1.0%6.2%4.3%13.7%6.1%0.3%34d42.2%$45.7B1.7%4.8%17.54×23.19×1.25×6.87×22.9%1.381.5%4d100.0%0d05.6%20d28.0%1040d
MCD
Mor snoozed
snooze ran out 15 Sep
Equity — Undervalued 1 11 2 25 9
vs 200-day avg -18.7%
Price to book -162.14×
Year to date -23.3%
Book value/share growth 52.5%
EBITDA margin 53.9%
Return on assets 13.2%
1.6%1.1%-8.3%-15.2%-24.3%-20.4%-22.3%-23.3%-31.4%-8.8%-18.7%19.2%1.01×0.45-36.2pp-18.2pp-4.0pp-7.1pp-13.8pp-10.9pp3.66×7.89×$5.6B1.08×-0.1%5.0%57.4%46.5%31.7%53.9%0.7pp0.4pp3.7%7.9%83.9%31.9%9.2%1d0.9%50.1813.2%52.5%12.4%3.1%5.8%-2.5%3.7%53.9%-0.6%0.6%59.7%71.2%48.5%3.3%1.47×83.7%$2.1B4.3%0.4%19.05×17.01×2.06×-162.14×25.3%2.061.9%3d75.0%0d1-0.5%27d-25.7%308d
AMAT
Equity — Growth - Regular 1 9 2 16 31
Price to book 16.12×
Op cash flow/share growth -5.4%
P/E trailing 44.92×
Unrealised P&L 236.9%
Year to date 102.6%
vs S&P 500, 1y 123.5pp
0.0%-1.6%10.1%-11.5%30.9%139.4%159.2%102.6%-29.6%6.6%20.6%58.9%0.69×1.59123.5pp-14.6pp3.8pp-26.7pp-24.3pp92.5pp3.1pp-16.3pp-31.1pp9.2pp-0.19×35.46×$5.4B2.42×0.01×28.7%4.0%8.9%49.4%33.7%30.1%32.9%1.2pp0.9pp24.8%5.5%81.4%28.4%18.3%76d0.6%58.5441.1%15.5%10.8%-5.4%12.6%10.9%17.9%2.7%4.4%70.1%-3.1%2.4%0.1%16.5%24.3%17.4%0.4%0.57×89.7%$4.9B1.4%0.8%44.92×28.18×0.83×16.12×22.7%1.451.8%2d100.0%0d06.9%35d236.9%581d
ORCL
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 42 31 9 12
Capex / op cash flow 174.1%
FCF conversion -138.6%
L1 sector · 1y -114.8pp
Book value/share growth 102.6%
Op cash flow/share growth 49.7%
Return on equity 41.2%
-2.0%1.9%-13.5%-2.5%2.0%-51.3%-19.3%-27.8%-56.4%-3.1%-13.3%56.2%0.78×1.77-67.1pp-5.5pp-21.0pp-17.2pp-54.6pp-107.3pp-21.1pp-25.8pp-55.8pp-59.1pp3.95×5.25×-$28.3B1.17×0.19×251.7%23.8%28.5%64.0%35.6%26.4%48.0%-4.7pp1.9pp29.6%55.5%-138.6%174.1%15.4%1.3%65.2341.2%6.4%102.6%49.7%15.3%10.0%24.6%-1.5%17.3%66.7%2.6%7.1%1.5%31.4%18.1%1.4%1.19×35.1%$206M-5.6%1.9%22.04×12.79×0.81×6.88×69.2%1.582.7%2d100.0%0d1-3.6%63d-26.7%282d
NVO
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 43 23 16 13
Interest expense, YoY 156.5%
Yield vs its 5y avg 3.22×
Payout on FCF 178.6%
Book value/share growth 35.2%
Free cash flow yield 17.5%
Return on equity 59.8%
-1.9%0.4%-16.9%-23.2%0.3%-37.0%-68.0%-26.2%-41.5%-14.6%-17.5%46.5%0.93×0.38-52.9pp-26.2pp-19.6pp-26.2pp-12.8pp-51.8pp-17.3pp-26.1pp-12.4pp-59.7pp0.64×32.03×$24.8B0.87×0.24×63.3%17.7%156.5%82.0%42.5%35.4%52.7%-3.7pp-2.9pp2.1%16.6%28.3%75.7%22.9%59d2.0%44.6459.8%18.7%35.2%-1.6%16.8%9.7%36.3%-0.6%6.4%58.7%0.0%45.1%178.6%43.5%4.8%3.22×52d51.9%$1.4B17.5%0.5%9.18×11.29×4.32×4.95×22.7%2.710.8%3d75.0%0d006.0%27d-34.8%435d
INTU
Tov buy
Mor snoozed
snoozed to 31 Oct
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 33 20 12 17
Yield vs its 5y avg 2.93×
L1 sector · 1y -118.9pp
Tier 1 · 1y -118.9pp
Op cash flow/share growth 48.1%
Capital returned vs earnings 148.0%
Share count, YoY -3.8%
-0.9%4.2%-7.6%7.8%-18.5%-55.2%-52.0%-55.5%-57.2%-8.6%-24.1%50.6%0.72×1.01-71.0pp4.8pp-14.8pp-6.4pp-76.1pp-111.4pp-14.7pp-14.7pp-78.0pp-63.4pp0.17×24.50×$8.4B1.51×0.17×44.3%20.1%3.6%81.0%17.6%21.3%31.9%0.6pp2.6pp13.7%-0.5%188.7%2.5%2.9%1.4%31.3423.6%10.5%0.2%48.1%15.7%35.2%105.5%-0.2%13.9%71.2%-3.8%9.6%29.2%15.6%15.2%1.9%2.93×0d148.0%$5.4B10.9%0.4%17.91×10.89×0.93×4.17×37.6%2.063.0%2d100.0%0d0-5.6%42d-28.4%142d
ADBE
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 33 19 10 14
Interest expense, YoY 55.6%
Book value/share growth -12.0%
L1 sector · 1y -95.8pp
Op cash flow/share growth 33.0%
Return on assets 20.1%
Return on equity 61.9%
0.1%-3.4%-9.4%4.6%1.3%-33.2%-53.1%-33.4%-35.9%-9.9%-9.7%40.8%0.90×1.42-49.0pp1.6pp-16.7pp-9.7pp-55.3pp-88.3pp-16.7pp-18.1pp-56.5pp-39.5pp0.12×34.21×$9.6B0.77×57.7%7.3%55.6%89.2%34.8%28.1%38.2%0.2pp0.6pp12.9%-2.4%138.2%1.8%9.9%0.1%47.7261.9%20.1%-12.0%33.0%18.1%4.4%3.5%0.0%10.5%63.4%-6.3%8.2%0.4%0.0%0.0%0.00×158.2%$11.3B10.9%0.8%13.01×8.42×0.58×7.74×18.1%2.775.3%4d100.0%0d002.0%62d-51.5%665d
AVGO
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 18 18 22 20
vs its peer group, 1y -204.4pp
Price to book 17.77×
L3 subgroup · 1y -204.4pp
Op cash flow/share growth 36.3%
Unrealised P&L 145.4%
Rule of 40 139.81
-1.4%8.0%0.7%-7.5%4.6%7.4%105.4%7.2%-25.0%-0.4%0.8%46.9%0.72×1.48-8.4pp-10.5pp-6.1pp-22.4pp-51.9pp-45.8pp-7.7pp-11.6pp-61.2pp-141.6pp1.02×8.08×$23.7B2.50×0.13×59.6%-4.7%-18.8%75.5%54.3%42.9%58.6%4.7pp11.7pp85.5%3.3%116.4%2.3%11.2%13d1.0%139.8144.2%15.4%18.7%36.3%17.2%22.6%34.2%-1.7%23.9%59.2%1.2%11.8%0.0%32.4%41.4%40.5%0.7%0.56×17d75.5%$6.3B1.5%3.2%47.40×19.14×0.36×17.77×43.1%1.261.1%2d100.0%0d06.2%62d145.4%1338d
NKE
Tov sell
Mor sell
Equity — Turnaround 0 22 16 26 6
Yield vs its 5y avg 3.33×
Op cash flow/share growth -22.8%
vs 200-day avg -29.0%
Capital returned vs earnings 82.1%
Earnings beat rate 100.0%
Book value/share growth 11.9%
-0.3%-2.6%-10.1%-20.0%-22.2%-50.4%-57.6%-46.3%-51.4%-11.0%-29.0%36.3%0.67×1.10-66.3pp-23.0pp-6.1pp-12.7pp-11.4pp-46.0pp0.60×2.08×0.24×73.1%0.0%43.4%7.9%6.7%10.7%0.2pp0.2pp-4.3%5.0%70.3%23.8%12.8%59d3.6221.6%6.9%11.9%-22.8%4.6%43.2%0.1%0.2%91.8%0.5%1.5%78.8%110.2%83.9%4.8%3.33×37d82.1%$146M4.3%0.1%16.46×20.13×1.40×3.42×11.4%2.819.0%3d100.0%0d102.4%70d-21.9%118d
SBUX
Mor sell
Equity — Turnaround 0 20 11 19 5
Op cash flow/share growth -22.3%
Payout on EPS 142.8%
Book value/share growth -8.4%
Capital returned vs earnings 149.3%
Return on assets 8.0%
Rank in its group 3
-3.1%-4.4%-11.1%-14.8%-6.4%13.3%-5.7%7.7%-18.0%-10.9%-8.3%27.3%0.71×0.97-2.5pp-17.8pp-7.2pp-6.6pp7.0pp28.4pp3.91×5.62×$1.9B0.76×0.42×2.2%-3.5%22.3%12.9%5.2%14.7%-4.1pp-4.5pp-1.4%2.2%131.5%48.6%3.4%21d2.4%11.528.0%-8.4%-22.3%2.1%60.8%-1.3%2.8%90.4%0.3%0.9%0.1%142.8%113.5%58.4%2.7%1.19×55d149.3%$02.4%0.1%52.41×29.05×1.11×-13.47×23.1%2.333.9%7d50.0%0d00-1.2%20d-16.7%143d
NFLX
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 18 11 14 14
Price to book 9.82×
vs 200-day avg -15.0%
vs S&P 500, 1y -57.3pp
Op cash flow/share growth 39.7%
Return on assets 16.1%
Return on equity 49.5%
2.1%4.8%-7.3%-5.8%-30.3%-41.4%-1.4%-24.1%-43.0%-5.7%-15.0%36.5%1.00×1.61-57.3pp-8.8pp-9.0pp-15.1pp-33.8pp-49.9pp0.25×17.38×$8.7B1.14×0.11×55.2%-11.0%8.0%49.1%33.4%28.2%30.4%2.4pp2.8pp13.4%3.7%86.2%6.8%4.5%46.7849.5%16.1%9.0%39.7%7.5%4.5%30.7%-1.1%15.9%70.5%-1.3%0.8%0.2%0.0%0.0%83.1%$9.1B3.2%0.8%22.37×18.69×1.22×9.82×30.1%1.802.3%3d50.0%0d11-0.3%12d-42.7%400d
VST
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 17 11 12 12
Current debt vs cash 9.71×
Price to book 17.95×
Gross margin, trend -10.8pp
1 week 14.9%
Return on equity 43.0%
PEG 0.34×
-3.7%14.9%5.9%1.7%5.1%-22.2%25.5%-0.5%-26.0%12.0%3.8%50.0%0.96×1.38-38.1pp-1.4pp11.2pp2.9pp14.6pp-9.5pp3.97×2.14×$336M0.97×9.71×373.3%10.7%14.3%38.3%13.8%11.6%34.6%-10.8pp-11.7pp-5.5%10.0%139.6%67.6%13.1%21d1.0%8.2743.0%5.9%-8.0%-10.4%12.2%58.4%-2.6%3.0%88.0%-0.5%0.6%15.3%37.8%12.2%0.6%0.58×17d161.7%$1.0B2.4%0.4%27.08×15.42×0.34×17.95×30.9%1.333.4%2d25.0%0d00.0%29d-10.0%448d
NVDA
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 19 9 5 30
Yield vs its 5y avg 14.14×
Price to book 24.86×
vs its peer group, 1y -181.5pp
Interest coverage 547.14×
Book value/share growth 99.7%
Return on assets 53.6%
-0.7%2.1%4.4%16.2%28.2%24.6%77.4%26.4%-3.1%6.9%16.9%37.5%0.98×2.228.8pp13.2pp-2.2pp2.4pp-27.2pp-27.7pp-3.4pp15.5pp-34.2pp-122.0pp-0.16×547.14×$96.4B4.59×0.02×17.0%0.0%4.9%74.7%66.2%63.7%66.4%-3.9pp-2.0pp105.9%85.3%80.5%5.9%17.8%36d172.14117.2%53.6%99.7%61.4%8.6%25.1%30.7%1.0%65.5%39.6%-0.7%3.0%3.5%1.0%0.9%0.4%14.14×28d34.2%$40.1B1.7%5.7%29.80×14.81×0.48×24.86×39.5%1.301.3%2d100.0%0d109.1%40d73.0%854d
UBER
Equity — Growth - Aggressive 0 22 7 18 10
PEG 5.92×
Earnings volatility 107.7%
GICS sector · 1y -86.2pp
Op cash flow/share growth 44.2%
Book value/share growth 27.9%
Return on equity 37.2%
-0.1%0.8%-6.5%-8.0%-4.8%-31.1%-10.2%-16.3%-31.9%-6.4%-8.3%34.9%0.68×1.26-47.0pp-11.0pp-13.7pp-23.0pp-61.7pp-86.2pp-13.5pp-31.8pp-63.1pp-37.3pp1.34×14.18×$9.3B0.84×51.9%5.8%-15.9%40.8%13.3%17.3%13.5%0.4pp4.3pp12.2%20.6%97.1%3.3%7.4%0.0%25.5237.2%6.9%27.9%44.2%6.5%4.7%107.7%0.5%18.3%89.3%-1.9%3.5%0.0%0.0%64.9%$6.5B7.0%0.4%15.00×15.47×5.92×5.11×47.5%1.582.3%3d50.0%0d1-2.8%27d-11.2%532d
CRM
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 16 7 23 21
L1 sector · 1y -68.8pp
Tier 1 · 1y -68.8pp
GICS sector · 1y -61.5pp
3 months 36.8%
Op cash flow/share growth 18.6%
Share count, YoY -3.4%
-1.0%-6.1%-10.8%36.8%30.1%-7.6%-23.8%-16.1%-17.4%-0.5%11.1%46.5%1.38×1.26-23.4pp33.7pp-18.2pp23.9pp-25.2pp-61.5pp-18.2pp16.7pp-25.4pp-11.8pp2.47×0.84×0.35×110.4%12.8%77.3%21.4%22.0%29.4%0.5pp1.2pp10.8%9.1%193.1%4.0%34.5%1.0%32.1819.4%5.7%0.1%18.6%14.4%4.5%26.6%9.6%78.5%-3.4%8.5%15.7%11.0%10.6%0.8%21d190.2%$12.6B7.9%0.8%20.33×13.87×0.78×4.77×27.5%1.754.5%2d100.0%0d1-5.1%55d-17.5%470d
NEE
Equity — Undervalued 0 15 7 31 10
Interest expense, YoY 104.6%
Current debt vs cash 2.12×
Net debt / EBITDA 6.69×
EBITDA margin 50.9%
Net margin 32.4%
Capital returned vs earnings 68.5%
-0.6%0.3%-8.7%-12.1%-19.0%-8.9%-4.9%-4.6%-22.5%-7.0%-12.4%20.6%0.79×0.64-24.7pp-15.1pp-8.1pp-15.4pp-17.6pp8.3pp6.69×1.99×-$1.4B0.53×2.12×161.7%12.5%104.6%61.0%31.5%32.4%50.9%2.2pp0.5pp12.4%11.9%47.0%74.3%14.7%32d2.0%43.9211.7%2.4%7.6%-7.0%8.0%23.3%-2.1%10.7%70.7%1.3%1.3%53.5%145.7%37.5%3.3%1.31×41d68.5%2.0%0.8%17.20×17.44×1.55×2.80×27.3%1.902.7%5d100.0%0d08.3%13d-9.6%42d
HON
Equity — Undervalued 0 12 7 22 7
Book value/share growth -23.6%
Earnings volatility 101.3%
Unusual items 3.8%
Capital returned vs earnings 143.4%
Return on equity 46.6%
P/E trailing 7.56×
-1.6%-4.2%-1.6%-8.3%-17.2%-1.2%0.1%0.1%-21.3%-6.7%-11.1%27.3%0.62×0.89-17.1pp-11.3pp3.4pp-4.1pp-15.8pp-20.9pp3.14×5.07×$4.1B1.21×0.81×185.4%7.5%28.2%36.5%20.2%21.6%22.4%-1.5pp-1.7pp4.3%-2.0%114.7%15.4%20.4%60d3.8%24.5546.6%5.7%-23.6%7.5%4.8%13.2%101.3%-1.3%7.8%82.5%-2.2%0.5%0.4%34.7%54.9%46.4%1.4%0.65×143.4%$3.8B8.4%0.8%7.56×20.82×3.47×3.50×26.1%2.002.3%3d100.0%0d0-0.6%14d-12.2%196d
MS
Equity — Undervalued 0 11 7 11 10
Receivables / revenue 173.9%
Op cash flow/share growth -1,433%
Debt / equity 517.3%
Cash runway 189.7q
Gross margin 87.6%
Capital returned vs earnings 73.7%
-1.6%-0.7%-13.7%-15.9%4.8%20.0%73.7%5.2%-19.6%-10.3%-3.8%28.4%0.73×1.214.1pp-19.0pp-8.7pp-16.4pp-2.2pp18.1pp-$69.8B189.7q2.00×0.03×517.3%6.5%7.7%87.6%41.6%25.9%0.0%28.0%16.9%-123.3%173.9%0.2%69.5718.0%1.3%8.4%-1,433%9.1%16.3%0.7%14.5%-1.5%2.9%0.0%32.3%2.5%0.87×69d73.7%$5.8B-7.1%0.8%15.08×13.74×1.76×2.75×19.7%2.311.2%3d100.0%0d000.1%6d49.4%668d
TM
Equity — Undervalued 0 10 7 14 8
Payout on FCF 690.0%
Price to book 14.90×
FCF conversion 4.7%
Free cash flow yield 82.8%
Interest coverage 86.47×
Op cash flow/share growth 48.2%
0.2%-0.1%-4.3%5.1%-13.2%-7.6%4.3%-14.4%-26.4%-4.0%-8.8%26.4%0.77×0.38-23.4pp2.1pp0.7pp16.6pp-0.9pp4.0pp4.02×86.47×$119.3B1.17×1.30×115.0%1.9%16.8%7.9%8.6%10.8%10.4%12.7%4.7%96.7%30.7%37d1.0%18.2612.4%2.3%11.3%48.2%4.2%24.3%0.4%92.6%-0.1%25.9%690.0%22.6%3.4%1.25×191d32.2%82.8%0.4%8.05×11.61×1.56×14.90×27.8%0.1%3d75.0%0d0-3.3%28d-11.7%331d
ABBV
Equity — Undervalued 0 9 7 6 25
Book value/share growth -198.2%
Unusual items 8.3%
Payout on EPS 190.4%
FCF conversion 421.6%
EBITDA margin 47.8%
Return on assets 10.5%
-1.8%2.5%7.1%6.7%25.5%15.3%38.1%16.7%-3.0%3.2%14.8%25.3%0.70×0.23-0.6pp3.6pp7.8pp7.9pp16.0pp8.0pp12.7pp11.2pp19.1pp5.7pp3.65×3.28×$14.9B0.81×1.30×-0.4%3.0%72.8%40.0%9.8%47.8%0.2pp11.7pp10.2%-0.9%421.6%6.4%20.6%30d8.3%50.2310.5%-198.2%1.0%14.9%4.6%83.0%-2.0%8.6%67.2%0.1%1.6%190.4%65.4%61.3%2.6%0.75×299.0%$980M3.8%0.8%75.30×16.39×0.54×-79.35×5.3%1.701.2%4d75.0%0d08.4%22d42.6%491d
ASML
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 13 6 11 20
Price to book 1,588×
Downgrades, 180d 2
P/E trailing 59.33×
Interest coverage 97.42×
Return on equity 53.9%
Return on assets 16.4%
1.3%1.1%3.6%1.3%26.2%85.1%121.8%70.9%-8.6%5.6%17.6%46.1%0.73×1.3069.2pp-1.7pp-3.1pp-13.2pp-29.2pp35.6pp-4.4pp-1.6pp-36.5pp-52.9pp-0.45×97.42×$10.9B1.33×0.22×9.1%-15.7%-27.2%52.7%37.1%30.1%38.2%1.6pp2.7pp21.3%4.1%114.8%9.3%128d58.3653.9%16.4%8.3%14.4%10.1%12.3%0.2%15.6%65.4%-2.0%0.6%0.0%28.6%23.1%0.5%0.65×72d88.5%$6.0B1.6%2.6%59.33×31.39×1.58×1,588×15.2%1.400.4%1d75.0%0d2-6.3%6d100.0%609d
DUK
Equity — Undervalued 0 13 6 22 7
Current debt vs cash 14.45×
FCF conversion -34.1%
Capex / op cash flow 113.7%
EBITDA margin 50.7%
Capital returned vs earnings 66.4%
Earnings beat rate 100.0%
-0.4%1.2%-5.1%-8.2%-13.5%-8.1%4.0%-1.8%-14.4%-4.1%-7.2%15.9%0.65×0.34-24.0pp-11.2pp-3.4pp-10.2pp-10.3pp9.4pp5.37×2.57×-$5.3B0.66×14.45×162.2%5.6%7.4%52.0%27.5%16.0%50.7%1.1pp0.5pp1.1%5.0%-34.1%113.7%13.1%52d1.2%28.609.9%2.8%3.2%-0.2%7.7%16.8%-1.8%6.2%73.4%0.2%0.0%64.2%26.8%3.8%1.00×66.4%$0-1.9%0.4%17.33×16.04×2.13×1.67×18.3%2.052.7%5d100.0%0d0-4.2%28d-8.2%69d
TSM
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 12 6 5 27
Price to book 95.85×
L2 group · 1y -89.7pp
Tier 2 · 1y -89.7pp
Interest coverage 166.04×
Free cash flow yield 41.1%
EBITDA margin 71.3%
-1.4%1.4%6.1%6.5%27.4%52.9%150.2%53.2%-4.5%8.3%19.3%39.9%0.63×1.2437.1pp3.5pp-0.5pp-7.7pp-28.0pp1.9pp-1.6pp4.4pp-35.1pp-89.7pp-0.89×166.04×$980.0B2.46×0.04×16.5%3.5%17.9%64.2%60.3%49.9%71.3%3.8pp5.2pp36.0%18.5%58.5%56.4%7.3%28d0.1%96.3440.0%19.0%26.2%24.6%6.5%11.0%20.6%1.2%31.6%49.2%-0.0%0.0%25.4%47.0%20.5%0.8%0.60×27.5%$041.1%2.5%33.84×21.24×0.86×95.85×19.2%1.380.6%3d100.0%0d00.0%7d119.0%575d
PANW
Equity — Growth - Aggressive 0 10 6 10 36
P/E trailing 1,007×
Earnings volatility 255.5%
Share count, YoY 22.0%
Book value/share growth 188.0%
6 months 141.2%
vs 200-day avg 58.7%
-0.7%1.6%19.5%19.0%141.2%84.9%126.8%118.6%-6.8%9.6%58.7%47.4%1.28×0.9369.1pp16.0pp13.6pp5.4pp91.2pp35.4pp14.6pp-2.5pp95.0pp88.4pp-0.36×$4.1B0.87×9.3%-5.8%-100.0%70.4%5.4%2.7%13.6%-3.1pp-7.4pp34.5%105.5%1,340%9.7%31.6%0.2%39.901.7%1.4%188.0%0.4%22.2%12.7%255.5%0.8%24.5%93.9%22.0%15.5%0.0%0.0%325.7%$1.0B1.2%0.8%1,007×82.54×2.01×11.94×-1.4%1.712.7%3d100.0%0d011.5%42d113.8%520d
PFE
Equity — Turnaround 0 9 6 27 19
Unusual items 14.3%
PEG 12.89×
Payout on EPS 226.3%
Capital returned vs earnings 125.7%
EBITDA margin 39.9%
Gross margin 74.7%
-1.5%-1.9%-0.7%13.8%1.4%7.4%-5.4%10.8%-5.5%0.3%4.4%21.4%0.77×0.28-8.4pp10.8pp-1.2pp16.1pp-11.5pp-1.0pp2.9pp20.1pp-11.1pp-4.1pp3.09×3.82×$6.4B1.27×0.27×74.3%-0.1%-13.6%74.7%27.9%6.8%39.9%2.4pp4.3pp2.6%-2.5%116.8%22.5%19.0%62d14.3%30.485.0%5.8%-2.3%-8.5%16.7%7.8%139.8%-1.0%-1.6%72.2%0.3%1.3%226.3%107.7%83.5%6.2%1.31×125.7%5.8%0.4%36.30×9.52×12.89×1.85×5.2%2.462.7%5d100.0%0d-11-4.5%26d9.2%1170d
PLTR
Equity — Growth - Aggressive 0 7 6 5 43
Price to book 48.94×
P/E trailing 171.61×
P/E forward 84.92×
Op cash flow/share growth 80.9%
Book value/share growth 44.4%
Unrealised P&L 215.2%
2.5%4.7%16.9%54.2%52.5%8.4%380.2%12.0%-4.1%14.6%30.8%58.3%0.66×1.60-7.4pp51.2pp10.8pp42.2pp-1.6pp-44.7pp11.8pp35.6pp-1.0pp5.6pp-6.39×7.23×2.1%84.8%47.1%49.0%43.2%2.1pp20.8pp92.8%40.4%129.3%1.6%23.3%139.9238.1%17.3%44.4%80.9%12.5%23.0%39.7%2.6%56.2%68.4%2.2%15.3%0.0%0.0%4.6%$75M0.4%0.8%171.61×84.92×1.85×48.94×0.4%1.842.8%2d100.0%0d010.6%25d215.2%633d
SHOP
Equity — Growth - Aggressive 0 7 6 6 31
P/E trailing 112.21×
Price to book 16.88×
Unusual items 5.8%
Op cash flow/share growth 24.9%
3 months 34.8%
1 week 11.4%
0.0%11.4%23.8%34.8%47.8%-0.2%101.1%3.2%-8.8%16.0%28.2%58.8%0.89×2.62-16.1pp31.8pp18.1pp21.9pp-6.6pp-53.8pp19.3pp14.6pp-6.2pp-3.8pp-2.49×5.35×1.4%47.8%17.6%14.5%18.1%-2.3pp1.6pp33.7%9.1%163.0%1.3%3.6%1d5.8%51.2515.5%10.2%15.7%24.9%13.3%12.3%123.0%2.2%30.1%83.7%0.7%3.9%0.0%0.0%0.9%0.4%112.21×67.76×1.73×16.88×4.2%1.691.4%2d75.0%0d06.9%26d54.1%689d
AMD
Equity — Growth - Aggressive 0 6 6 3 46
P/E trailing 161.82×
Price to book 15.40×
Revenue growth vs peers -55.8pp
Op cash flow/share growth 152.3%
Unrealised P&L 358.1%
6 months 168.1%
-1.8%3.0%25.4%16.0%168.1%169.3%267.1%196.2%-3.7%21.4%66.3%68.2%0.69×2.45153.4pp13.0pp19.8pp2.2pp119.4pp123.8pp20.6pp15.2pp125.7pp43.3pp-1.21×32.60×$6.6B2.61×0.07×6.4%34.9%42.4%55.7%17.2%15.6%23.1%0.2pp2.6pp50.1%11.1%155.4%12.6%18.2%83d1.1%67.3510.2%5.1%8.9%152.3%23.4%13.1%32.1%0.1%34.3%89.3%0.5%4.7%0.0%0.0%44.4%$1.9B0.7%1.3%161.82×40.35×0.63×15.40×0.3%1.492.5%2d100.0%0d26d358.1%693d
HD
Tov snoozed
snoozed to 25 Oct
Equity — Undervalued 0 20 5 20 4
Current debt vs cash 4.52×
Price to book 17.37×
Debt / equity 380.3%
Book value/share growth 92.7%
Return on equity 104.3%
Return on assets 12.1%
1.2%2.4%-7.8%-14.6%-14.8%-24.7%-30.2%-16.0%-27.3%-9.5%-14.4%25.7%0.75×1.00-40.5pp-17.6pp-3.4pp-6.5pp-2.8pp-15.9pp2.43×8.71×$10.2B1.08×4.52×380.3%2.0%3.9%32.8%12.9%8.4%14.6%-0.1pp-0.8pp5.7%9.3%89.3%22.5%3.1%57d18.56104.3%12.1%92.7%-17.7%7.8%21.6%-2.2%3.2%87.3%0.2%0.3%0.1%64.8%72.4%56.1%3.2%1.35×35d64.7%$04.4%0.8%20.24×18.09×2.50×17.37×30.8%1.891.2%3d75.0%0d0-12.0%40d-23.0%451d
PEP
Tov snoozed
snoozed to 09 Oct
Equity — Undervalued 0 16 5 23 7
Days to earnings 0d
vs 200-day avg -15.0%
Debt / equity 238.9%
Return on equity 51.5%
Capital returned vs earnings 104.8%
Book value/share growth 13.5%
0.9%-0.6%-9.8%-9.4%-20.7%-10.0%-26.7%-13.0%-27.2%-8.2%-15.0%21.1%0.72×0.36-25.9pp-12.4pp-12.1pp-11.7pp-18.3pp-20.4pp2.73×10.14×$6.6B0.93×0.64×238.9%7.0%22.0%54.2%16.8%10.8%19.5%-0.4pp0.3pp6.4%8.0%93.1%36.5%9.9%23d2.1%23.2451.5%8.9%13.5%-3.0%13.3%24.7%-1.0%2.3%85.6%-0.3%0.3%75.3%99.6%63.2%4.7%1.56×34d104.8%$1.0B4.5%0.4%16.37×14.02×1.38×7.72×19.0%2.752.1%3d75.0%0d105.5%0d-13.7%135d
SLB
Equity — Undervalued 0 16 5 17 5
Revenue growth vs peers -43.8pp
Share count, YoY 6.7%
Op cash flow/share growth -7.9%
Capital returned vs earnings 119.0%
Book value/share growth 15.8%
Earnings beat rate 100.0%
1.4%-0.0%-14.8%3.0%-7.4%43.2%10.2%26.8%-19.5%-7.9%-4.0%36.3%0.99×0.8427.4pp-0.0pp-16.4pp-16.7pp-16.5pp2.7pp1.25×8.69×$4.0B1.44×0.46×47.0%-12.6%9.0%17.0%12.7%8.5%20.3%-2.3pp-2.1pp5.0%12.1%134.6%30.0%24.3%51d2.6%17.7112.9%6.2%15.8%-7.9%2.0%4.6%12.1%-0.8%-1.6%84.7%6.7%0.9%56.0%35.3%24.7%2.4%1.29×36d119.0%$2.4B6.3%0.4%23.50×15.17×1.37×2.77×28.2%1.604.7%5d100.0%0d02.8%15d-0.9%248d
GE
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 10 5 27 6
Price to book 17.69×
PEG 4.06×
vs 200-day avg -7.2%
Op cash flow/share growth 85.6%
Capital returned vs earnings 103.4%
Return on equity 48.2%
-0.9%-3.7%-10.2%-16.2%-3.9%-0.6%60.4%-2.4%-22.6%-11.2%-7.2%33.1%0.66×1.37-16.4pp-19.2pp-6.4pp-13.2pp-0.5pp-20.2pp0.85×12.86×$6.4B0.98×0.17×113.2%1.0%-14.5%31.1%20.6%17.7%22.7%0.6pp1.5pp21.1%5.7%83.5%14.9%20.2%94d0.2%41.6748.2%5.1%-1.1%85.6%3.4%6.2%10.4%0.1%18.5%81.1%-2.3%19.6%20.0%17.0%0.6%1.65×3d103.4%$7.6B2.3%1.3%35.47×33.05×4.06×17.69×31.2%1.551.5%4d100.0%0d12d-0.4%141d
DDOG
Equity — Growth - Aggressive 0 8 5 16 35
P/E trailing 555.12×
Price to book 22.81×
P/E forward 93.31×
FCF conversion 849.0%
Net debt / EBITDA -19.13×
6 months 154.7%
2.3%0.4%32.0%3.2%154.7%69.1%124.3%104.1%-5.2%12.7%48.5%67.3%0.69×1.5153.3pp0.2pp26.7pp-11.2pp105.4pp18.9pp28.2pp-19.7pp109.6pp71.3pp-19.13×12.49×$904M3.21×29.3%-49.8%56.5%79.5%0.7%4.5%2.1%-0.8pp-3.3pp35.6%14.8%849.0%12.9%21.6%36.274.7%0.2%33.4%17.1%45.2%10.6%49.3%2.8%27.7%101.3%3.0%21.9%0.0%0.0%0.9%0.4%555.12×93.31×1.27×22.81×3.4%1.493.5%3d100.0%0d28d90.5%373d
EOG
Equity — Undervalued 0 8 5 12 24
Interest expense, YoY 70.3%
Op cash flow/share growth -14.3%
Unusual items 3.8%
EBITDA margin 54.2%
Capital returned vs earnings 94.9%
Interest coverage 28.07×
2.5%4.6%1.7%10.6%8.2%33.7%13.3%40.7%-4.2%2.3%11.4%29.0%0.90×0.3717.9pp7.6pp4.1pp-7.1pp3.0pp-9.1pp0.0pp-12.0pp-1.2pp-9.0pp0.30×28.07×$3.2B1.85×25.9%23.3%70.3%62.6%40.7%25.7%54.2%-5.0pp-3.2pp58.7%9.8%69.3%65.7%11.9%16d3.8%99.4222.5%11.0%5.3%-14.3%18.0%41.1%-0.0%-3.4%67.9%-3.5%1.0%31.4%62.6%21.5%2.8%1.07×94.9%$2.6B4.5%0.4%11.50×9.63×1.35×2.44×11.0%2.343.3%5d100.0%0d-100.1%28d33.2%240d
KO
Mor snoozed
snoozed to 03 Nov
Equity — Undervalued 0 6 5 12 28
Payout on FCF 165.8%
Price to book 10.35×
PEG 4.03×
Book value/share growth 29.4%
Return on equity 42.0%
Capital returned vs earnings 72.7%
1.3%1.0%-1.6%5.2%11.2%31.5%25.7%24.4%-6.0%-1.2%8.3%18.8%0.63×0.3215.7pp2.2pp-1.8pp6.6pp21.6pp31.5pp1.49×10.67×$3.6B1.30×0.21×115.5%0.0%-0.1%61.9%34.9%28.6%33.9%0.6pp1.3pp6.7%4.2%40.4%28.5%6.3%34d0.0%41.5742.0%9.4%29.4%8.9%4.0%19.9%-0.8%1.9%68.9%-0.0%0.6%0.1%62.5%165.8%118.5%2.4%0.86×23d72.7%$746M1.4%0.4%26.11×24.67×4.03×10.35×8.6%1.750.9%3d100.0%0d-11-2.5%19d7.3%244d
MU
Equity — Growth - Aggressive 0 6 5 3 47
Price to book 11.93×
Revenue volatility 59.6%
Earnings volatility 93.6%
vs its peer group, 1y 374.5pp
Revenue growth vs peers 293.8pp
Revenue growth 379.3%
-2.2%-3.0%6.4%7.3%152.5%441.6%938.1%273.0%-15.2%10.1%53.4%80.0%0.51×2.23425.8pp4.3pp-0.1pp-6.9pp103.1pp409.1pp-1.1pp5.3pp107.9pp354.6pp-2.07×21.24×$1.2B3.31×3.7%-3.6%-15.1%80.7%80.7%63.8%81.7%17.4pp21.0pp379.3%19.3%19.5%90.5%19.2%82d0.5%459.9888.3%44.6%18.6%103.6%10.2%59.6%93.6%0.0%48.9%73.8%1.2%2.6%1.1%31.3%3.0%0.1%0.25×6.1%$00.1%0.4%14.32×5.16×0.16×11.93×46.1%1.372.5%1d100.0%0d0-3.0%76d1,503%1106d
SAP
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 20 4 15 16
Price to book 65.07×
L1 sector · 1y -87.6pp
Tier 1 · 1y -87.6pp
Op cash flow/share growth 75.7%
3 months 30.5%
Gross margin 73.7%
-1.6%-1.9%-2.2%30.5%25.7%-25.4%-8.8%-14.9%-26.5%-1.0%7.1%39.0%0.75×0.76-41.2pp27.5pp-9.2pp17.3pp-29.8pp-80.2pp-8.9pp9.9pp-30.1pp-31.1pp-0.14×21.87×$7.9B1.15×0.14×22.0%-35.1%-9.7%73.7%27.6%20.4%30.8%-0.1pp3.3pp9.4%-5.2%117.5%8.1%15.7%2.5%37.0218.3%9.5%-2.0%75.7%18.0%3.6%10.0%-0.3%7.7%73.9%0.1%4.6%37.7%32.6%30.0%1.4%1.05×156d65.4%$1.9B3.5%0.8%26.54×21.34×1.64×65.07×22.1%1.620.4%2d75.0%0d000.0%13d-29.1%596d
LRCX
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 10 4 16 28
Price to book 32.98×
P/E trailing 57.07×
Target raises - lowers, 30d -1
Interest coverage 53.67×
Return on assets 22.8%
Book value/share growth 28.2%
-0.3%-3.4%2.6%-7.0%27.0%130.5%305.6%92.0%-25.0%6.4%18.4%63.9%0.74×1.85114.7pp-10.0pp-4.2pp-21.9pp-28.4pp83.2pp-5.6pp-11.0pp-35.5pp-0.9pp-0.16×53.67×$4.7B2.63×0.00×33.0%-18.3%-12.0%50.5%37.4%31.3%37.2%1.8pp3.3pp30.0%10.2%67.3%16.5%23.0%67d0.1%67.3965.1%22.8%28.2%-3.8%10.2%10.0%14.3%0.2%26.0%64.7%-1.4%1.7%0.0%18.1%26.0%21.7%0.4%0.51×15d70.5%$3.9B1.2%0.8%57.07×27.94×1.45×32.98×14.3%1.462.3%3d100.0%0d-10-11.1%13d34.1%232d
COST
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 8 4 12 12
Price to book 11.76×
PEG 4.43×
P/E forward 37.98×
Interest coverage 71.25×
Book value/share growth 23.4%
Op cash flow/share growth 17.6%
0.8%3.8%4.3%4.0%-8.0%3.8%6.6%10.1%-13.4%1.9%-1.3%19.9%0.84×0.87-12.0pp1.0pp5.6pp5.1pp-2.4pp-3.1pp-0.83×71.25×$7.7B1.06×28.4%-2.9%-8.9%12.8%3.8%3.0%4.7%0.2pp0.1pp11.1%10.4%96.8%41.2%1.2%24d0.0%14.8928.4%8.7%23.4%17.6%11.0%11.6%0.5%8.2%96.2%0.0%0.3%26.7%27.9%16.4%0.6%1.09×76d38.1%$903M1.9%1.3%45.74×37.98×4.43×11.76×11.4%1.951.7%4d75.0%0d105.1%63d12.7%1250d
BRK-B
Equity — Undervalued 0 6 4 12 11
PEG 10.06×
Cost / income proxy 79.9%
Net interest income / assets -0.4%
Price to book 0.00×
Off 52-week high -5.8%
P/E trailing 12.75×
0.1%1.3%0.2%2.3%4.5%1.4%11.7%0.8%-5.8%-0.2%2.8%14.6%0.74×0.59-14.4pp-0.7pp7.2pp4.4pp-2.6pp-3.1pp17.27×$20.0B2.89×0.01×17.1%2.4%-2.5%30.3%32.6%22.3%34.0%10.0%5.9%37.4%45.5%10.6%42.5612.1%6.0%10.5%50.3%12.5%50.9%-0.4%-3.2%79.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%$02.3%2.5%12.75×23.42×10.06×0.00×8.1%2.001.0%3d75.0%0d1-3.7%30d32.6%1171d
CAT
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 6 4 19 16
Price to book 19.09×
Current debt vs cash 2.13×
Debt / equity 232.8%
Unrealised P&L 245.6%
Return on equity 57.0%
Capital returned vs earnings 89.5%
-1.0%-2.5%-2.0%-14.1%2.4%60.5%107.7%40.6%-24.9%-2.0%0.8%40.0%0.71×1.5844.6pp-17.2pp2.9pp-10.8pp6.6pp49.6pp2.74×23.99×$7.0B1.37×2.13×232.8%9.1%-2.0%29.7%22.2%14.5%21.8%-4.2pp-3.7pp24.0%12.3%83.9%36.5%31.9%98d0.4%46.1857.0%9.0%12.3%0.2%3.2%7.7%19.5%-0.5%4.3%83.5%-2.6%26.0%36.9%23.4%0.8%0.57×80d89.5%$5.2B2.0%1.3%34.68×24.84×1.42×19.09×20.5%2.072.0%4d100.0%0d21d245.6%797d
WMT
Equity — Undervalued 0 6 4 15 11
PEG 4.22×
Price to book 8.92×
Rule of 40 9.35
Op cash flow/share growth 14.8%
Capital returned vs earnings 71.2%
1 week 5.8%
2.0%5.8%4.0%-1.7%-14.6%7.2%38.4%-1.0%-18.4%1.6%-6.7%26.5%0.80×0.58-8.7pp-4.7pp5.2pp-2.0pp-10.6pp1.1pp1.37×11.53×$12.1B0.77×0.88×71.7%6.5%2.6%24.8%3.5%3.0%6.0%0.1pp-0.1pp5.9%9.1%68.2%64.1%1.6%30d9.3522.3%6.4%10.2%14.8%3.0%16.5%-0.9%4.7%95.8%-0.7%35.0%50.3%18.1%0.9%0.79×71.2%$8.1B1.7%1.3%39.96×34.22×4.22×8.92×14.9%1.531.8%3d100.0%0d000.0%42d24.1%546d
ISRG
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 5 4 20 17
Price to book 8.09×
vs 200-day avg -6.7%
Year to date -26.7%
Op cash flow/share growth 26.0%
L1 sector · 1m 20.9pp
Tier 1 · 1m 20.9pp
0.2%3.5%18.6%0.9%-8.7%-7.3%-13.6%-26.7%-31.2%8.3%-6.7%36.9%0.72×1.46-23.1pp-2.1pp20.9pp1.4pp-23.0pp-17.8pp4.96×66.7%33.6%28.4%37.9%-1.5pp1.1pp18.5%9.2%87.2%17.8%15.2%67d52.1017.4%10.5%8.9%26.0%13.0%6.9%8.7%1.8%20.5%70.7%-0.4%7.8%0.0%0.0%80.4%$2.3B1.7%0.8%47.63×34.29×1.87×8.09×15.0%1.792.3%4d100.0%0d1-5.4%12d-4.9%386d
CVX
Equity — Undervalued 0 4 4 8 16
Interest expense, YoY 104.9%
Share count, YoY 11.9%
Earnings volatility 81.3%
3 months 21.4%
Off 52-week high -3.0%
1 day 3.0%
3.0%2.0%0.7%21.4%11.0%37.5%42.1%38.7%-3.0%3.9%12.7%23.9%0.88×0.5221.6pp18.4pp3.0pp6.3pp6.5pp-4.5pp-1.2pp2.3pp2.5pp-4.0pp0.69×17.22×$15.4B1.25×0.02×19.0%15.8%104.9%44.3%21.9%9.8%24.2%1.0pp-0.7pp53.5%26.1%134.9%51.1%9.8%19d75.3712.2%5.9%9.4%-3.7%16.6%81.3%-0.4%-4.6%91.0%11.9%67.2%76.9%37.6%3.4%0.87×50d201.9%$12.1B4.0%1.3%20.34×14.42×0.90×2.18×6.6%1.721.1%3d100.0%0d000.0%22d31.0%685d
LIN
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 8 3 19 13
Revenue growth vs peers -26.2pp
Target raises - lowers, 30d -1
Current debt vs cash 1.29×
Capital returned vs earnings 107.5%
EBITDA margin 39.0%
Interest coverage 20.17×
0.2%3.3%3.5%-7.7%-3.6%3.7%3.3%13.7%-11.5%1.2%-0.5%19.2%0.76×0.71-12.2pp-10.7pp1.76×20.17×$4.6B0.88×1.29×68.9%10.4%-4.7%48.4%28.1%20.4%39.0%0.8pp1.2pp9.3%8.3%73.8%50.8%14.6%22d1.3%37.4218.4%7.2%2.5%12.1%0.4%3.1%8.2%-0.3%3.0%72.8%-2.0%0.5%0.0%40.0%55.2%27.2%1.3%1.02×35d107.5%$4.6B2.3%0.8%31.31×24.77×1.80×5.72×12.0%1.681.3%3d100.0%0d-10-0.5%21d1.1%482d
FCX
Equity — Undervalued 0 7 3 10 17
Op cash flow/share growth -21.4%
PEG 4.54×
Revenue growth vs peers -42.8pp
3 months 17.4%
EBITDA margin 36.9%
Earnings beat rate 100.0%
-1.1%2.5%-7.3%17.4%6.9%65.8%46.2%39.9%-11.5%-0.1%11.0%47.8%0.70×1.3950.0pp14.4pp0.70×18.27×$747M2.07×0.11×32.1%3.7%15.7%38.3%33.4%11.4%36.9%-1.9pp-1.9pp-7.3%6.1%50.6%80.1%3.8%106d0.1%26.1014.8%7.6%7.8%-21.4%10.2%26.7%-0.6%1.8%74.9%-0.3%0.5%29.6%77.5%15.4%0.8%0.70×44.1%$107M1.1%0.8%35.00×16.55×4.54×5.07×8.6%1.782.4%2d100.0%0d03.8%19d14.9%66d
LMT
Equity — Undervalued 0 7 3 21 8
Price to book 13.18×
Debt / equity 234.2%
vs 200-day avg -10.8%
Return on equity 89.2%
Op cash flow/share growth 25.4%
Capital returned vs earnings 122.2%
0.6%-0.6%-6.3%-3.1%-19.5%-2.3%-17.4%3.9%-27.4%-8.9%-10.8%28.2%0.65×0.10-18.1pp-6.1pp-2.0pp1.8pp-18.3pp-22.1pp1.92×6.30×$5.8B1.19×0.31×234.2%6.5%7.9%11.8%12.0%8.2%12.6%0.4pp0.4pp10.5%7.6%137.7%19.3%5.2%17d22.4689.2%8.6%8.4%25.4%5.1%39.1%-1.9%5.6%89.7%-2.1%0.4%50.3%45.3%36.6%2.7%1.06×37d122.2%$3.0B6.0%0.8%18.51×15.37×1.02×13.18×25.6%2.361.2%2d75.0%0d03.9%14d8.2%499d
UNH
Equity — Turnaround 0 6 3 23 7
Cost / income proxy 95.8%
Net interest income / assets -1.3%
Earnings volatility 64.0%
Capital returned vs earnings 111.7%
Net interest income growth 11.8%
Earnings beat rate 100.0%
-1.1%1.9%-7.2%-13.8%21.2%0.6%-36.0%12.7%-19.4%-4.9%4.2%35.4%0.66×0.61-15.3pp-16.8pp-8.6pp-15.5pp11.1pp-8.8pp1.82×4.67×$12.1B0.78×0.19×69.2%1.0%2.5%19.7%7.1%3.1%5.9%-3.8pp-3.8pp0.4%3.8%133.3%18.4%5.1%0.1%7.5314.2%4.9%2.6%-17.8%0.6%64.0%-1.3%11.8%95.8%-1.0%0.2%0.2%57.6%49.2%40.2%2.5%1.62×24d111.7%$5.5B4.8%1.3%23.92×16.45×1.01×3.42×29.5%1.581.6%3d100.0%0d0-2.3%5d27.4%232d
BAC
Equity — Undervalued 0 5 3 19 10
vs 50-day avg -13.4%
1 month -16.2%
vs 200-day avg -5.5%
Capital returned vs earnings 110.3%
Share count, YoY -5.2%
Net margin 29.5%
-2.4%-2.7%-16.2%-11.8%-0.9%4.9%30.9%-5.0%-19.9%-13.4%-5.5%22.4%1.06×1.21-11.0pp-14.8pp-11.6pp-11.7pp-8.6pp0.8pp-$65.9B0.06×3.6%-13.3%0.0%38.3%29.5%0.0%16.8%4.6%41.3%86.8%55.1011.2%1.0%8.9%251.2%4.9%7.5%1.8%6.8%-5.2%3.5%1.5%25.9%75.8%75.8%2.4%1.07×34d110.3%$24.1B3.5%0.8%12.07×9.97×0.85×1.33×28.2%1.561.2%3d100.0%0d00.0%6d-2.0%182d
RTX
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 5 3 18 3
vs 200-day avg -6.8%
Target raises - lowers, 30d -1
vs 50-day avg -11.1%
Op cash flow/share growth 46.5%
Earnings beat rate 100.0%
Capital returned vs earnings 53.8%
0.8%-1.8%-8.6%-6.9%-10.5%7.8%47.2%-0.9%-19.9%-11.1%-6.8%25.9%0.52×0.31-8.0pp-9.9pp-4.6pp-2.5pp-8.1pp-10.5pp2.04×5.76×$5.6B1.01×0.44×57.0%-8.8%-6.9%20.4%12.7%8.3%17.0%1.0pp2.4pp14.5%5.0%110.6%29.5%16.6%55d27.2012.3%4.2%7.6%46.5%3.2%5.4%11.1%-1.0%9.7%89.5%0.8%1.2%48.8%48.0%33.8%1.6%0.81×55d53.8%$50M3.0%0.8%32.00×23.14×2.21×3.69×27.2%1.831.0%3d100.0%0d-110.6%12d-11.4%219d
VZ
Mor snoozed
snoozed to 26 Dec
Equity — Undervalued 0 8 2 15 13
Current debt vs cash 10.37×
Net debt / EBITDA 4.02×
Debt / equity 184.1%
Free cash flow yield 10.3%
Capital returned vs earnings 66.9%
EBITDA margin 36.8%
0.2%-0.3%-9.0%8.6%-4.0%11.0%4.2%12.6%-11.3%-4.9%-1.4%24.9%0.80×0.25-4.8pp5.6pp-11.0pp2.1pp-2.3pp13.0pp4.02×4.39×$13.0B0.60×10.37×184.1%4.0%0.7%59.5%23.0%11.6%36.8%-0.9pp-0.1pp-0.7%5.1%114.6%47.0%19.6%6d0.3%22.3015.8%5.0%5.1%0.4%2.5%24.8%-1.6%2.5%78.8%0.2%72.8%58.4%30.9%6.2%1.00×66.9%10.3%0.4%11.94×8.67×0.83×1.83×11.5%2.272.0%5d100.0%0d0-3.7%18d5.8%377d
TJX
Equity — Undervalued 0 6 2 15 16
Price to book 14.64×
vs 200-day avg -9.5%
Rule of 40 16.31
Interest coverage 99.64×
Return on equity 62.2%
Unrealised P&L 114.4%
-0.8%3.1%6.8%-8.7%-16.5%-2.1%21.4%-10.3%-18.9%-1.4%-9.5%21.1%0.95×0.56-17.9pp-11.7pp13.7pp0.4pp-4.8pp10.4pp0.96×99.64×$4.8B1.15×0.17×134.4%0.0%-2.6%31.5%10.9%9.7%14.3%0.4pp0.7pp5.4%12.7%89.5%28.5%1.0%44d16.3162.2%13.5%22.8%13.6%8.1%12.4%0.3%7.1%88.1%-1.1%0.4%0.2%32.5%37.5%26.8%1.4%1.06×79.4%$2.5B3.2%0.4%25.51×23.86×2.57×14.64×23.2%1.7%2d100.0%0d0-5.4%41d114.4%972d
UNP
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 5 2 11 11
Days to cover 12d
Price to book 8.40×
PEG 2.72×
EBITDA margin 50.7%
Return on equity 39.7%
Capital returned vs earnings 82.9%
0.1%0.9%-4.7%-3.6%9.5%18.2%15.7%18.8%-13.0%-4.9%3.6%22.4%0.75×0.952.3pp-6.6pp-0.1pp1.3pp14.7pp1.3pp2.25×8.00×$4.2B0.99×0.72×150.8%1.8%3.2%56.3%41.0%28.9%50.7%0.3pp0.1pp11.5%2.9%77.0%40.8%7.6%12d52.4839.7%9.3%11.4%1.2%4.5%5.3%-1.8%1.1%59.8%-1.8%44.7%58.8%34.8%2.1%0.94×38d82.9%$2.7B3.4%0.4%22.28×19.34×2.72×8.40×19.4%1.725.1%12d75.0%0d000.0%14d19.8%265d
DIS
Tov sell
Equity — Turnaround 0 4 2 10 16
PEG 3.37×
Current debt vs cash 1.29×
Current ratio 0.71×
Op cash flow/share growth 30.8%
Unrealised P&L 70.1%
Rank in its group 1
0.8%4.2%0.5%9.7%5.8%-5.7%14.1%-7.2%-9.9%0.8%1.7%27.0%0.87×1.42-21.5pp6.7pp0.4pp3.5pp9.4pp-7.0pp2.13×7.62×$8.3B0.71×1.29×39.4%-7.9%-12.5%37.6%19.3%8.7%21.2%2.0pp1.6pp6.8%0.7%81.2%44.3%11.1%8d0.9%26.108.0%4.8%10.2%30.8%5.2%47.7%-0.7%3.4%85.4%-1.0%1.4%30.9%17.9%10.0%1.4%1.14×100d42.8%$3.5B5.5%0.4%21.76×14.12×3.37×1.66×19.8%1.481.1%3d100.0%0d0-2.8%35d70.1%977d
V
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 4 2 8 20
Price to book 19.90×
Unusual items 4.4%
Book value/share growth -0.8%
Interest coverage 45.09×
Return on equity 61.2%
EBITDA margin 69.9%
0.9%4.3%1.8%7.8%21.8%6.9%36.5%7.0%-2.6%1.7%11.1%21.9%0.78×0.77-9.0pp4.8pp9.1pp10.8pp17.2pp3.1pp0.39×45.09×$21.0B0.98×0.40×67.8%16.4%-8.1%97.7%66.1%50.8%69.9%-0.0pp-0.6pp14.4%5.4%107.6%6.4%7.8%4.4%80.5361.2%19.1%-0.8%18.4%4.5%6.2%-0.6%11.3%33.6%-2.4%2.2%22.1%21.5%20.1%0.7%1.01×58d114.4%$18.3B3.1%1.9%31.95×25.02×1.64×19.90×11.7%1.451.1%3d100.0%0d0-0.4%19d8.5%386d
AMZN
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 3 2 12 12
FCF conversion 9.9%
Capex / op cash flow 94.5%
Unusual items 2.1%
Book value/share growth 41.9%
Interest coverage 43.79×
Op cash flow/share growth 18.9%
-0.6%4.0%0.5%4.5%10.5%14.7%41.4%11.9%-10.1%0.1%6.8%33.8%0.69×1.46-1.2pp1.5pp6.3pp15.9pp26.8pp30.0pp0.78×43.79×$5.4B1.03×45.6%3.8%-5.5%50.8%13.7%17.4%21.8%1.4pp0.4pp19.6%30.9%9.9%94.5%9.4%20d2.1%33.2930.6%6.6%41.9%18.9%10.7%21.4%0.3%12.4%88.8%1.3%2.7%0.0%0.0%0.3%4.8%20.78×24.68×1.48×5.05×28.4%1.320.8%3d100.0%0d00.0%21d7.3%962d
MA
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 2 2 16 25
Price to book 89.96×
Debt / equity 439.6%
Return on equity 241.2%
Return on assets 24.1%
EBITDA margin 63.3%
0.9%4.6%0.8%10.0%14.3%-0.2%15.8%0.8%-4.3%0.7%8.1%22.5%0.72×0.76-16.0pp7.0pp7.9pp13.2pp8.7pp-4.9pp0.64×26.73×$15.7B1.06×0.06×439.6%2.0%11.8%100.0%61.1%46.3%63.3%1.6pp1.5pp14.1%12.6%109.8%6.9%14.1%1.2%75.21241.2%24.1%21.9%22.0%4.5%5.7%-1.3%16.4%40.5%-2.1%1.8%17.9%16.8%15.6%0.6%1.10×96.8%$11.7B3.3%1.3%31.65×24.99×1.46×89.96×15.9%1.430.8%3d100.0%0d1-5.6%21d13.1%212d
SCHW
Equity — Undervalued 0 7 1 16 12
Receivables / revenue 449.6%
vs 50-day avg -9.8%
EBITDA margin 0.0%
Op cash flow/share growth 263.2%
Capital returned vs earnings 137.1%
Gross margin 97.5%
-0.0%-2.9%-10.6%-6.3%-1.8%1.9%47.2%-4.4%-16.6%-9.8%-2.8%25.3%0.94×0.78-14.0pp-9.3pp-5.2pp-5.3pp-9.7pp-2.6pp$5.0B0.66×0.09×151.1%-18.8%-41.3%97.5%52.3%38.8%0.0%20.9%2.3%99.0%5.9%449.6%73.1820.3%2.1%6.4%263.2%6.4%8.9%2.4%22.0%-4.0%1.3%21.5%26.6%25.0%1.3%1.10×55d137.1%$9.8B5.3%0.4%17.40×12.10×0.84×3.76×28.2%1.781.2%3d75.0%0d104.9%7d1.5%384d
TMO
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 4 1 7 21
Op cash flow/share growth -8.7%
1 day -3.2%
Net debt / EBITDA 3.34×
3 months 22.1%
Rank in its group 1
6 months 28.1%
-3.2%-1.8%6.3%22.1%28.1%19.5%7.6%10.6%-7.7%2.8%17.8%29.0%0.86×0.883.7pp19.1pp6.8pp25.7pp19.0pp12.8pp3.34×6.15×$4.9B1.55×0.87×80.6%12.6%2.1%41.0%18.8%15.0%25.3%-0.3pp0.2pp10.5%13.4%93.9%19.5%20.0%44d0.8%29.2513.5%5.1%9.0%-8.7%3.1%4.9%7.6%-0.4%3.9%81.8%-1.2%0.7%9.7%10.1%8.1%0.3%1.17×23d54.2%$3.0B2.7%0.4%34.50×23.25×1.98×4.50×4.2%1.481.4%3d100.0%0d104.0%13d13.9%882d
COP
Equity — Undervalued 0 3 1 6 18
Gross margin, trend -4.8pp
Operating margin, YoY -4.1pp
Revenue growth vs peers -13.3pp
Capital returned vs earnings 114.1%
Share count, YoY -4.0%
3 months 23.9%
3.1%5.3%-0.9%23.9%8.4%42.8%20.8%43.0%-5.5%3.9%14.3%30.9%0.96×0.2426.9pp20.9pp1.0pp9.5pp3.2pp2.2pp-3.3pp5.6pp-0.9pp3.1pp0.61×11.26×$6.0B1.54×0.09×35.6%-3.9%11.3%47.6%31.5%14.4%41.5%-4.8pp-4.1pp35.5%-0.7%90.7%63.4%9.9%12d1.2%67.0114.2%7.5%3.6%2.4%13.0%38.9%-0.8%7.7%80.8%-4.0%43.7%55.2%20.2%2.5%1.11×52d114.1%$5.1B4.5%0.8%17.73×13.84×1.08×2.46×10.4%1.791.3%3d75.0%0d13.4%28d50.2%350d
META
Equity — Growth - Regular 0 3 1 7 22
Interest expense, YoY 62.9%
Price to book 7.03×
Net debt issued 24.4%
Interest coverage 74.76×
Op cash flow/share growth 27.0%
Return on assets 14.6%
-0.0%-0.7%17.6%14.2%14.8%0.5%21.6%9.3%-7.5%13.9%14.6%41.7%1.06×1.19-15.4pp11.2pp20.9pp8.9pp20.2pp0.4pp0.21×74.76×$44.9B2.23×43.0%24.4%62.9%81.8%34.8%29.8%48.0%0.3pp-0.7pp28.0%32.6%76.3%60.2%9.8%0.2%62.8329.9%14.6%19.2%27.0%28.5%9.2%47.4%0.3%22.2%58.6%-0.2%10.2%7.9%11.5%4.6%0.3%17d52.2%$26.2B2.5%3.2%27.17×20.88×0.98×7.03×10.8%1.411.4%2d75.0%0d112.1%20d15.7%231d
NEM
Equity — Undervalued 0 3 1 12 24
Revenue growth vs peers -20.4pp
PEG 2.78×
1 month -10.3%
Op cash flow/share growth 68.1%
Gross margin, trend 15.0pp
Interest coverage 50.53×
0.4%-0.6%-10.3%20.2%-4.2%28.9%116.1%14.2%-15.8%-4.4%2.0%50.3%0.66×0.5313.1pp17.2pp-0.24×50.53×$7.1B2.55×15.8%-63.0%-38.9%68.0%51.6%33.4%66.2%15.0pp17.0pp15.1%1.4%103.0%29.4%4.7%43d1.7%66.6725.9%15.8%17.1%68.1%0.7%12.1%30.2%-0.0%21.3%51.4%-3.4%0.4%12.9%15.2%10.7%0.9%0.43×35d48.1%$2.3B6.1%0.4%14.37×11.24×2.78×3.42×20.8%1.571.8%2d100.0%0d005.1%14d-1.8%217d
GLD
ETF — Sector & Thematic 0 1 1 11 2
vs 200-day avg -9.3%
Unrealised P&L 85.5%
Rank in its group 4
0.3%-1.5%-5.7%-0.3%-13.9%1.3%55.6%-4.8%-26.0%-4.9%-9.3%29.7%0.86×0.12-3.3pp0.0%0.8%2.22×0d85.5%1264d
IAU
ETF — Sector & Thematic 0 1 1 10 2
vs 200-day avg -9.3%
Unrealised P&L 54.8%
Rank in its group 3
0.3%-1.5%-5.6%-0.2%-13.8%1.4%56.1%-4.7%-25.9%-4.9%-9.3%29.5%0.86×0.12-3.3pp0.0%0.4%2.23×0d54.8%638d
T
Tov snoozed
snooze ran out 22 Sep
Equity — Undervalued 0 3 0 19 16
vs 200-day avg -2.4%
Rule of 40 27.09
Current ratio 0.97×
Free cash flow yield 11.6%
Share count, YoY -4.1%
P/E trailing 8.10×
0.3%1.0%-4.1%16.7%-8.5%-6.5%12.3%-1.2%-16.6%-1.7%-2.4%24.8%0.78×0.44-22.3pp13.7pp-5.1pp11.9pp-7.7pp-7.9pp2.71×4.97×$12.6B0.97×0.51×129.1%5.1%0.7%59.7%24.8%16.9%35.3%-0.2pp0.2pp2.3%6.4%88.6%51.7%7.0%7d0.7%27.0918.3%4.2%10.5%8.4%3.1%39.9%-1.6%2.7%80.1%-4.1%0.0%36.6%42.1%20.3%4.5%0.80×67.2%$6.6B11.6%0.4%8.10×9.56×1.54×1.53×17.2%2.001.9%4d100.0%0d1-9.0%13d-8.7%454d
EFA
ETF — Broad Index 0 1 0 8 1
vs 200-day avg -0.7%
Off 52-week high -6.3%
-1.0%-0.7%-5.3%-1.8%0.1%7.7%24.5%6.3%-6.3%-4.2%-0.7%16.1%0.68×0.88-4.8pp1.7%0.4%16.88×1.41×0d-3.3%63d
IWM
ETF — Broad Index 0 1 0 6 2
vs 200-day avg -0.7%
Off 52-week high -9.9%
Unrealised P&L 34.7%
-1.0%-1.5%-6.7%-7.5%4.9%11.4%26.3%11.6%-9.9%-5.8%-0.7%18.7%0.67×1.15-10.6pp0.7%0.4%16.17×1.26×0d34.7%582d
JPM
Equity — Undervalued 0 1 0 9 10
vs 50-day avg -6.9%
Capital returned vs earnings 89.8%
Share count, YoY -3.6%
Unrealised P&L 69.2%
-0.9%-2.0%-7.6%-2.6%5.3%7.4%55.0%1.4%-10.9%-6.9%1.4%22.4%0.80×1.01-8.4pp-5.6pp-1.7pp-1.2pp-1.6pp3.8pp-$245.7B37.6q0.04×1.6%-3.4%0.0%50.4%34.9%0.0%30.4%10.5%-259.0%61.4%0.6%80.7917.8%1.4%9.1%-265.0%6.2%17.5%2.2%7.3%-3.6%0.3%25.7%2.0%0.90×2d89.8%$34.6B-17.0%2.5%14.00×13.05×1.57×2.46×14.1%2.120.9%4d75.0%0d1-5.5%5d69.2%933d
XOM
Equity — Undervalued 0 1 0 8 20
Op cash flow/share growth -1.6%
Interest coverage 69.44×
Capital returned vs earnings 130.0%
Share count, YoY -4.0%
2.8%3.0%5.0%22.7%8.8%48.0%38.2%40.2%-4.4%4.7%12.6%25.9%0.87×0.2132.1pp19.7pp8.3pp8.0pp3.8pp8.7pp4.5pp4.1pp-0.4pp10.0pp0.47×69.44×$23.0B1.14×0.88×15.9%0.1%-39.5%29.8%15.9%9.1%18.8%-0.6pp-1.2pp44.1%-1.0%81.9%54.6%11.0%30d59.9612.6%5.5%2.5%-1.6%15.1%43.6%-0.1%-4.5%89.5%-4.0%52.5%73.0%33.2%2.4%0.72×52d130.0%$20.3B3.4%1.9%21.71×14.81×1.38×2.67×2.9%2.401.1%3d100.0%0d10.3%22d56.9%471d
QQQ
ETF — Broad Index 0 0 0 1 8 —
Unrealised P&L 69.1%
Rank in its group 1
Off 52-week high -1.3%
-0.6%1.5%4.8%4.1%23.4%23.2%53.9%22.6%-1.3%4.4%12.2%19.9%0.66×1.121.1pp0.2%1.3%28.83×2.10×0d69.1%545d
SPY
ETF — Broad Index 0 0 0 0 2 —
Off 52-week high -0.9%
Rank in its group 2
-0.4%1.3%1.1%3.0%13.9%15.0%35.1%13.5%-0.9%1.1%7.2%13.0%0.73×1.00-0.0pp0.7%2.5%24.58×1.80×0d14.8%332d
XSP
ETF — Volatility & Hedge 0 0 0 0 0 — — -0.0%27.4%23d
83 rows × 130 columns = 10790 cells drawn. How to read a cell: every measure has a limit, the same level the fundamentals monitor alerts on. Red is past the limit — a problem; deep red is well past it. Amber is inside the limit but close to it — a warning, not a problem. Green is a strength, at the level our better names reach. Blank means no number, or a measure that does not apply to that kind of company. A red cell with a bar on its left edge is new (became a problem in the last 30 days) or has got materially worse; a faded one has been marked as seen. Click any number to see what it has been doing, with what the measure means above the chart. Right-click a red cell to mark it seen. What a measure means: click a line under What’s wrong / What’s strong, hover a column heading, or open the list below.
What each measure means — the 121 columns shown
Price & movement
1 day — The share price against the previous day's close, as a percentage. One day's move is mostly noise and on its own is not a reason to act; it is here so a big day shows beside the fundamentals. Red on the table below -2%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
1 week — The share price against where it was a week earlier, as a percentage. Red on the table below -5%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
1 month — The share price against where it was a month earlier, as a percentage. Red on the table below -8%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
3 months — The share price against where it was three months earlier, as a percentage. Red on the table below -12%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
6 months — The share price against where it was six months earlier, as a percentage. A fall of 15% over six months is the desk's quarterly-review bar, so red on the table below -15%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
1 year — The share price against where it was a year earlier, as a percentage. Red on the table below -20%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
2 years — The share price against where it was two years earlier, as a percentage. Red on the table below -30%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
Year to date — The share price against its last close of the previous year - the return since 1 January, as a percentage. Red on the table below -10%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
Off 52-week high — How far the price sits below its highest point of the last twelve months, as a percentage (0% means it is at the high). A stock a third below its high has lost something the market once believed about it. Red on the table below -35%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
vs 50-day avg — The price against the average of its last 50 daily closes, as a percentage above or below. Below the average, the recent trend is down. Red on the table below -6%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
vs 200-day avg — The price against the average of its last 200 daily closes - the long trend - as a percentage above or below. A price under its 200-day average has fallen out of its trend, the usual technical definition of a stock in trouble. Red on the table anywhere below the average, i.e. under 0%. Price moves are deliberately left out of the Compare email.
Realised volatility — How much the share price actually moves: the size of its day-to-day swings over the last 30 trading days, scaled up to a yearly figure (a stock at 40% typically moves about 2.5% a day). Not scored - it is the yardstick the other thresholds are read against, and a volatile stock is not a bad one. Shown for context.
Volatility regime — The last 30 days' volatility divided by the stock's own volatility over roughly the last seven months. Above 1 the stock has started moving more than is normal for it - the usual sign that something has changed, whichever way the price is going. A problem above 1.5x.
Beta — How far the stock tends to swing for each move in the market, from the data vendor: 1 moves with the market, 2 moves twice as far, below 1 less. Not scored - a high beta is a fact about the stock, not a fault. Shown for context.
Vs its group
vs S&P 500, 1y — The stock's one-year return minus the S&P 500's over the same year, in percentage points. Well behind the index means the position has not earned its place against the simplest alternative. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
vs S&P 500, 3m — The same comparison as 'vs S&P 500, 1y', over three months: the stock's three-month return minus the S&P 500's over the same three months, in percentage points. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
vs its peer group, 3m — The stock's three-month return minus the average three-month return of the other holdings in its peer group, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The peer group is the deepest node of the /categories reporting tree with at least three other priced holdings (the 'Levels up to find peers' column says which). A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
vs its peer group, 1y — The same comparison as 'vs its peer group, 3m', over a year: the stock's one-year return minus the average one-year return of the other holdings in its peer group, in percentage points. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
Revenue growth vs peers — The company's revenue growth minus the median revenue growth of the other holdings in its peer group, in percentage points (the median, so one hypergrowth name in a small group cannot make every sibling look slow). Growing slower than its peers means it is losing share, or is in the slower part of the market. A problem 10 points behind, i.e. under -10pp.
Rank in its group — Where the stock's three-month return ranks among its peer group, 1 being the best. Read it with 'Peers to compare with': 4th of 4 and 4th of 30 are different statements. A problem at 11th or worse.
Peers to compare with — How many other priced holdings are in the peer group the comparison used, the stock itself excluded. Under 3 no comparison is made at all, and against 3 or 4 names a gap can be one stock's news rather than a pattern. Not scored. Shown for context.
Levels up to find peers — How far up the reporting tree the comparison had to climb to find at least three peers: 0 means the stock's own subgroup had enough, 1 that it was compared against its group, 2 against its whole sector. The higher the number, the broader - and looser - the peer set behind the columns beside it. Not scored.
Its group's weight — The whole peer group - this stock and its peers - as a share of the book's total value. Concentration read at the level of an idea rather than one position: several small holdings on one theme can add up to one large bet. A problem above 15%.
Reporting tree
L1 sector · 1m — The stock's one-month return minus the average one-month return of the other holdings in its sector in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The sector is the top level of the /categories reporting tree, one of 18 - a broad group, so a gap here says the stock is out of step with its whole sector. A problem 12 points behind, i.e. under -12pp.
L1 sector · 3m — The stock's three-month return minus the average three-month return of the other holdings in its sector in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The sector is the top level of the /categories reporting tree, one of 18 - a broad group, so a gap here says the stock is out of step with its whole sector. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
L1 sector · 6m — The stock's six-month return minus the average six-month return of the other holdings in its sector in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The sector is the top level of the /categories reporting tree, one of 18 - a broad group, so a gap here says the stock is out of step with its whole sector. A problem 30 points behind, i.e. under -30pp.
L1 sector · 1y — The stock's one-year return minus the average one-year return of the other holdings in its sector in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The sector is the top level of the /categories reporting tree, one of 18 - a broad group, so a gap here says the stock is out of step with its whole sector. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
L2 group · 1m — The stock's one-month return minus the average one-month return of the other holdings in its group in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The group is the second level of the /categories reporting tree, the one the desk files the stock under. Blank where fewer than three other holdings in the group are priced. A problem 12 points behind, i.e. under -12pp.
L2 group · 3m — The stock's three-month return minus the average three-month return of the other holdings in its group in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The group is the second level of the /categories reporting tree, the one the desk files the stock under. Blank where fewer than three other holdings in the group are priced. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
L2 group · 6m — The stock's six-month return minus the average six-month return of the other holdings in its group in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The group is the second level of the /categories reporting tree, the one the desk files the stock under. Blank where fewer than three other holdings in the group are priced. A problem 30 points behind, i.e. under -30pp.
L2 group · 1y — The stock's one-year return minus the average one-year return of the other holdings in its group in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The group is the second level of the /categories reporting tree, the one the desk files the stock under. Blank where fewer than three other holdings in the group are priced. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
L3 subgroup · 1m — The stock's one-month return minus the average one-month return of the other holdings in its subgroup in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The subgroup is the third level of the /categories reporting tree; only 55 stocks are filed this deep, so most rows are blank. A problem 12 points behind, i.e. under -12pp.
L3 subgroup · 3m — The stock's three-month return minus the average three-month return of the other holdings in its subgroup in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The subgroup is the third level of the /categories reporting tree; only 55 stocks are filed this deep, so most rows are blank. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
L3 subgroup · 6m — The stock's six-month return minus the average six-month return of the other holdings in its subgroup in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The subgroup is the third level of the /categories reporting tree; only 55 stocks are filed this deep, so most rows are blank. A problem 30 points behind, i.e. under -30pp.
L3 subgroup · 1y — The stock's one-year return minus the average one-year return of the other holdings in its subgroup in the reporting tree, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The subgroup is the third level of the /categories reporting tree; only 55 stocks are filed this deep, so most rows are blank. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
Tier labels
Tier 1 · 1m — The stock's one-month return minus the average one-month return of the other holdings in its Tier 1 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same top-level label the desk gives it - what we call it, not where it reports. A problem 12 points behind, i.e. under -12pp.
Tier 1 · 3m — The stock's three-month return minus the average three-month return of the other holdings in its Tier 1 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same top-level label the desk gives it - what we call it, not where it reports. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
Tier 1 · 6m — The stock's six-month return minus the average six-month return of the other holdings in its Tier 1 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same top-level label the desk gives it - what we call it, not where it reports. A problem 30 points behind, i.e. under -30pp.
Tier 1 · 1y — The stock's one-year return minus the average one-year return of the other holdings in its Tier 1 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same top-level label the desk gives it - what we call it, not where it reports. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
Tier 2 · 1m — The stock's one-month return minus the average one-month return of the other holdings in its Tier 2 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same second-level desk label. A problem 12 points behind, i.e. under -12pp.
Tier 2 · 3m — The stock's three-month return minus the average three-month return of the other holdings in its Tier 2 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same second-level desk label. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
Tier 2 · 6m — The stock's six-month return minus the average six-month return of the other holdings in its Tier 2 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same second-level desk label. A problem 30 points behind, i.e. under -30pp.
Tier 2 · 1y — The stock's one-year return minus the average one-year return of the other holdings in its Tier 2 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same second-level desk label. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
Tier 3 · 1m — The stock's one-month return minus the average one-month return of the other holdings in its Tier 3 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same most specific desk label; there are 274 such labels across 391 names, so few have the three peers a comparison needs. A problem 12 points behind, i.e. under -12pp.
Tier 3 · 3m — The stock's three-month return minus the average three-month return of the other holdings in its Tier 3 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same most specific desk label; there are 274 such labels across 391 names, so few have the three peers a comparison needs. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
Tier 3 · 6m — The stock's six-month return minus the average six-month return of the other holdings in its Tier 3 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same most specific desk label; there are 274 such labels across 391 names, so few have the three peers a comparison needs. A problem 30 points behind, i.e. under -30pp.
Tier 3 · 1y — The stock's one-year return minus the average one-year return of the other holdings in its Tier 3 cohort, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The cohort is the other holdings carrying the same most specific desk label; there are 274 such labels across 391 names, so few have the three peers a comparison needs. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
GICS
GICS sector · 1m — The stock's one-month return minus the average one-month return of the other holdings in its GICS sector, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. GICS is the standard industry classification - a machine label, kept separate from the desk's own two; a fund has no GICS sector and gets no cohort. A problem 12 points behind, i.e. under -12pp.
GICS sector · 3m — The stock's three-month return minus the average three-month return of the other holdings in its GICS sector, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. GICS is the standard industry classification - a machine label, kept separate from the desk's own two; a fund has no GICS sector and gets no cohort. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
GICS sector · 6m — The stock's six-month return minus the average six-month return of the other holdings in its GICS sector, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. GICS is the standard industry classification - a machine label, kept separate from the desk's own two; a fund has no GICS sector and gets no cohort. A problem 30 points behind, i.e. under -30pp.
GICS sector · 1y — The stock's one-year return minus the average one-year return of the other holdings in its GICS sector, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. GICS is the standard industry classification - a machine label, kept separate from the desk's own two; a fund has no GICS sector and gets no cohort. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
GICS industry · 1m — The stock's one-month return minus the average one-month return of the other holdings in its GICS industry, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The industry is one level below the GICS sector; a fund gets no cohort, and only an industry with at least three other holdings compares at all. A problem 12 points behind, i.e. under -12pp.
GICS industry · 3m — The stock's three-month return minus the average three-month return of the other holdings in its GICS industry, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The industry is one level below the GICS sector; a fund gets no cohort, and only an industry with at least three other holdings compares at all. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
GICS industry · 6m — The stock's six-month return minus the average six-month return of the other holdings in its GICS industry, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The industry is one level below the GICS sector; a fund gets no cohort, and only an industry with at least three other holdings compares at all. A problem 30 points behind, i.e. under -30pp.
GICS industry · 1y — The stock's one-year return minus the average one-year return of the other holdings in its GICS industry, in percentage points - each peer counting equally, the stock itself left out. The industry is one level below the GICS sector; a fund gets no cohort, and only an industry with at least three other holdings compares at all. A problem 25 points behind, i.e. under -25pp.
Solvency
Net debt / EBITDA — Debt minus cash, divided by yearly cash earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA): roughly how many years of earnings it would take to repay the debt. The standard read on how heavily a company is borrowed. Blank where EBITDA is negative, which makes the multiple meaningless. A problem above 3x.
Interest coverage — Operating profit divided by the interest bill, i.e. how many times over the company can pay its interest. Near 1x the lenders are taking almost everything the business makes; below 1x it is not even earning its interest. A problem under 1.5x.
FCF after interest — Free cash flow minus the interest bill, in dollars: the cash left for shareholders once the lenders have been paid. Below zero the business cannot carry its own debt and must borrow or issue shares just to stand still. A problem below zero.
Cash runway — How many quarters the cash on hand would last at the current rate of burn: cash divided by the average quarterly operating cash outflow over the last four quarters. Only computed for a company that is actually burning cash - a cash generator has no runway question and is left blank. A problem under 4 quarters, i.e. less than a year before it must raise money.
Current ratio — What the company can turn into cash within a year (cash, money owed to it, inventory) divided by what it owes within a year. Under 1 the near-term bills exceed the near-term resources. A problem under 1x.
Current debt vs cash — Debt falling due within a year, divided by the cash on hand. Above 1 the cash cannot cover the debt coming due, so it will have to be refinanced or paid out of earnings. A problem above 1x.
Debt / equity — Total debt as a percentage of shareholders' equity, from the data vendor. The higher it is, the more of the company belongs to its lenders rather than its owners, and the less room there is when something goes wrong. A problem above 150%.
Net debt issued — Debt raised minus debt repaid over the latest financial year, as a percentage of the debt already outstanding. Positive means the company borrowed more than it paid back; borrowing while cash flow is negative is the signal. A problem above 20%.
Interest expense, YoY — The interest bill in the latest financial year against the year before, as a percentage change. A sharp rise means the debt is being refinanced at higher rates, or there is more of it. A problem when it is up by more than 20%.
Margins & earnings
Gross margin — Revenue left after the direct cost of what was sold, as a percentage of revenue. It says how much pricing power the product has; the right level depends on the industry, so the change over time (the trend column) is the better signal. A problem under 20%.
Operating margin — Operating profit as a percentage of revenue - what is left of each sale after all the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. Below zero the core business loses money. A problem below zero.
Net margin — Net profit as a percentage of revenue - what is left after everything, including interest and tax. A problem below zero.
EBITDA margin — Cash earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) as a percentage of revenue - profit before financing costs and accounting charges, the nearest thing to cash profitability. A problem under 5%.
Gross margin, trend — Gross margin in the latest financial year minus the year before, in percentage points. A falling gross margin means the product is getting harder to sell at the old price, or costs more to make. A problem when it has fallen by more than 2 points, i.e. under -2pp.
Operating margin, YoY — Operating margin in the latest financial year minus the year before, in percentage points. A problem when it has fallen by more than 2 points, i.e. under -2pp.
Revenue growth — Revenue in the latest year against the year before, as a percentage, from the data vendor. A problem when revenue is shrinking, i.e. below 0%.
Total assets growth — Total assets in the latest financial year against the year before, as a percentage. For a bank or lender it stands in for loan-book growth - whether the balance sheet is expanding or shrinking. Not scored on this table. Shown for context.
FCF conversion — Free cash flow as a percentage of reported net profit: how much of the profit actually arrives as cash. A wide gap between the two is where the accounting and the cash part company. Blank where profit is negative, which makes the ratio meaningless. A problem under 60%.
Capex / op cash flow — Capital spending as a percentage of operating cash flow - how much of the cash the business makes has to go straight back into plant, equipment and the like. Blank where operating cash flow is negative. A problem above 80%.
Receivables / revenue — Money owed by customers (accounts receivable) as a percentage of yearly revenue - how much of what has been sold has not yet been paid for. Rising, it means customers are paying more slowly, or sales are being booked ahead of the cash. A problem above 40%.
Inventory days — How many days of sales are sitting in inventory: stock on hand divided by yearly revenue, times 365. Inventory rising into a slowdown is product nobody has bought yet. A problem above 120 days.
Unusual items — One-off gains and charges as a percentage of revenue (the size of the item, whichever direction). The more the reported numbers lean on things that will not repeat, the less the headline profit says about the ordinary business. A problem above 2%.
Rule of 40 — Revenue growth plus operating margin, both in percent - the software industry's test that a company may buy growth with margin or margin with growth, but the two together should still clear a bar. A problem under 30.
Return on equity — Net profit as a percentage of shareholders' equity: what the business earns on the money its owners have put in. A problem below zero.
Return on assets — Net profit as a percentage of total assets - what the company earns on everything it owns, which makes it the fairer test for a bank or any asset-heavy business. A problem below zero.
Book value/share growth — Book value per share (shareholders' equity divided by the share count) in the latest financial year against the year before, as a percentage. For a bank or insurer this is the compounding scorecard, where one quarter's profit says much less. A problem below zero, which means the compounding has stopped.
Op cash flow/share growth — Operating cash flow per share in the latest financial year against the year before, as a percentage. Used as a stand-in for a REIT's funds from operations, which we cannot compute exactly. A problem below zero.
R&D / revenue — Research and development spending as a percentage of revenue: what the company spends creating what it will sell next. The level is a choice that varies by industry; a cut is the signal. Not scored. Shown for context.
Revenue volatility — How much revenue swings from quarter to quarter: the spread of the last eight quarterly revenues as a percentage of their average. A high number means the revenue line is driven by events and lumpy contracts rather than a steady business. A problem above 30%.
Earnings volatility — How much net profit swings from quarter to quarter: the spread of the last eight quarters' profit as a percentage of their average. For an insurer it points at reserve charges or catastrophe losses; for anyone else, at earnings that are hard to rely on. A problem above 50%.
Lenders
Net interest income / assets — A bank's net interest income (interest earned minus interest paid) as a percentage of its total assets - a stand-in for net interest margin, i.e. what it earns on the balance sheet it carries. Only asked of banks and lenders. A problem under 1%.
Net interest income growth — Growth in a bank's total revenue in the latest financial year against the year before, as a percentage - the closest the statements come to growth in net interest income, its core earnings line. Only asked of banks and lenders. A problem below zero, which means the core business is shrinking.
Cost / income proxy — A bank's total expenses as a percentage of its revenue. Banks report a stricter efficiency ratio of their own; this is the nearest thing the statements allow. Only asked of banks and lenders. A problem above 65%.
Capital & payout
Share count, YoY — The number of shares outstanding in the latest financial year against the year before, as a percentage change. A rising count is dilution - the existing holders own less of the same company; a falling count is a buyback. A problem above +3%.
Stock comp / revenue — Stock-based pay (shares given to employees) as a percentage of revenue - a real cost of running the business that adjusted profit figures leave out, because no cash goes out the door. A problem above 15%.
Equity issued — New shares sold in the latest financial year, as a percentage of the company's market value - dilution sized against the company rather than quoted as a raw number. A problem above 5%.
Payout on EPS — The dividend as a percentage of earnings per share, from the data vendor. Above 80% little is left to reinvest or to absorb a bad year, and the dividend is one weak year away from a cut. A problem above 80%.
Payout on FCF — Dividends paid as a percentage of free cash flow - the harder of the two payout tests, because cash is what actually pays a dividend. Blank where free cash flow is negative. A problem above 100%, where the dividend is not covered by cash.
Payout on op cash flow — Distributions paid as a percentage of operating cash flow - the REIT payout test, since a REIT's cash flow rather than its accounting profit is what funds the payout. Blank where operating cash flow is negative. A problem above 100%, where the payout is not covered.
Dividend yield — The last twelve months of dividends as a percentage of the share price, from the data vendor. A high yield is not automatically good: it can mean a falling price as easily as a rising payment (see 'Yield vs its 5y avg'). Not scored. Shown for context.
Yield vs its 5y avg — The current dividend yield divided by the stock's own five-year average yield. Well above 1 usually means the price has fallen rather than that the payment has risen - the market pricing in a cut. A problem above 1.5x.
Days since ex-dividend — How many days since the shares last went ex-dividend (the last day a buyer had to own them to receive the payment). A gap longer than the usual interval between payments is the earliest evidence that a dividend has been suspended. Blank while the next payment is already scheduled. A problem above 400 days.
Capital returned vs earnings — Dividends plus share buybacks in the latest financial year, as a percentage of net profit - how much of what it earned the company handed back to shareholders. Blank where profit is negative or nothing was paid. For a bank a sharp fall is the sign that it is conserving capital. A problem below zero - which, as computed, it cannot be, so the colour here only ever marks a strength.
Share buybacks — How much the company spent repurchasing its own shares in the latest financial year, from the cash flow statement - the raw dollar figure behind 'Capital returned vs earnings' beside it. Not scored - what counts as a lot depends entirely on the company's size. Shown for context.
Free cash flow yield — Free cash flow over the latest financial year as a percentage of the company's market value - what the business generates at today's price, the cash version of an earnings yield. A problem below zero, i.e. a business consuming cash.
Our position size — Our position as a percentage of everything we hold (its market value over the book's total). A big position is a big bet whatever the company does; the fundamentals monitor's own size check uses net liquidity as the base, which is stricter. A problem above 5%.
Valuation & sentiment
P/E trailing — The share price divided by the last twelve months' earnings per share - how many years of today's profit the price is paying for. Not one of the desk's monitoring checks; carried because the desk's list scores it. Red on the table above 40x, or when negative - a loss-making company has no meaningful P/E.
P/E forward — The share price divided by next year's expected earnings per share, from analysts' estimates - cheaper than the trailing figure for a growing company, dearer for a shrinking one. Not one of the desk's monitoring checks; carried because the desk's list scores it. Red on the table above 30x, or when negative.
PEG — The price/earnings ratio divided by the expected earnings growth rate - a way of asking whether the growth justifies the multiple: near 1 is fairly priced by that rule, above 2 expensive. Not one of the desk's monitoring checks. Red on the table above 2.5x, or when negative.
Price to book — The share price divided by book value per share - what the market pays for each dollar of net assets on the balance sheet. Only meaningful against its peer group: a bank at 1x and a software company at 6x can both be ordinary. Red on the table above 6x, or when negative.
Upside to target — The average analyst price target against today's price, as a percentage above (or below) it. A target below the price means the analysts covering it, on average, see it falling; a target implying a multiple of today's price is usually one nobody has revisited. A problem below 0%.
Analyst rating — The average analyst rating, where 1 is strong buy and 5 is strong sell. Above 3 the consensus leans towards sell. A problem above 3.2.
Short interest — The share of the freely traded stock (the float) that has been sold short - borrowed and sold by investors betting the price will fall. A high number means a lot of money is positioned against the stock; it also means forced buying if they turn out to be wrong. A problem above 10%.
Days to cover — How many days of ordinary trading it would take the short sellers to buy back everything they have sold short: the total shares sold short, divided by the average number of shares traded in a day. A high number means a crowded short that cannot get out quickly - heavy bearish positioning, and the makings of a sharp squeeze upward if the shorts are forced to cover. A problem above 5 days.
Insider net, 180d — What the company's own directors and officers bought in the open market minus what they sold over the last 180 days, as a percentage of the company's market value. Grants, gifts and option exercises are deliberately left out - only money actually put in or taken out counts. Insiders sell for many reasons but buy for one. A problem under -0.25%, i.e. meaningful net selling.
Insider buys, 180d — How many open-market purchase transactions the company's own directors and officers made over the last 180 days - a raw count, alongside the net dollar figure beside it. Grants, gifts and option exercises are excluded, the same as the net figure. Not scored - a handful of buys is a real signal on a name where insiders rarely buy, and unremarkable on one where they routinely do. Shown for context.
Insider $ bought, 180d — The GROSS dollar amount the company's own directors and officers bought in the open market over the last 180 days - never netted against what they sold, which is what 'Insider net' beside it does. Grants, gifts and option exercises are excluded, the same as the net figure. Not scored - a small number is normal on most names. Shown for context.
Insider $ sold, 180d — The GROSS dollar amount the company's own directors and officers sold in the open market over the last 180 days - never netted against what they bought. A large figure here beside a small "Insider net" can mean heavy selling offset by a little buying, which the net percentage alone would hide on a large company. Not scored. Shown for context.
Earnings beat rate — The share of the last four quarterly reports in which earnings came in above the analysts' estimate. A company that keeps missing is either being guided badly or losing control of its numbers. A problem under 50%.
Days to exit — How many days of ordinary trading it would take us to sell the whole position: our share count divided by the stock's average daily volume over the last three months. Above one day we cannot get out in a session without moving the price. A problem above 1 day.
Expectations
Target raises - lowers, 30d — Analysts' price-target raises minus lowers over the last 30 days - a count, and the measurable version of estimate revisions (the estimates themselves are not in our data). More cutting than raising means the covering analysts are turning. A problem when negative.
Downgrades, 180d — How many analyst rating downgrades the stock has had in the last 180 days. A problem at 2 or more.
Price-target change — The average change in analysts' price targets over the last 180 days: each time an analyst moved a target, the new one against the old, averaged across those moves. A large cut means the analysts have marked the company down, whatever their rating says. A problem when cut by more than 10%, i.e. under -10%.
Days to earnings — How many days until the next scheduled earnings report - known volatility on a known date. Inside a week is when a position should already be sized for the report. A problem under 5 days, i.e. 4 or fewer.
Position & data
Unrealised P&L — Our unrealised gain or loss on the position as a percentage of what we paid for it - where we are, not where the stock is. A big loss is a position the thesis has not delivered on yet; a big gain has a tax bill attached. A problem under -20%.
Days held — How long we have held the position, counted from the earliest lot still open. For a Custodian-fed position that date is when the lot first appeared in the feed, so it is a floor on the true holding period rather than the exact figure. Not scored. Shown for context.
Static demo · synthetic data · read-only  ↩